All categories

3 years ago

How is a case of potential elder abuse different from a case of potential child abuse?

1 answer:

7 0

<span>Any case of neglect is terrible. I do not think there is much of a difference between elder abuse and child abuse. In both cases, the person is in some way reliant on their abuser. In the case of a child, they are stuck with their parents and are unable to just pick up and leave. In the case of an elder being abused, they are often in the same situation. Through disability or financial reasons, they cannot just venture out on their own. A case of abuse is no different, whether it is a child being abused or an elderly person.</span>

You might be interested in

Under the equal-field system, the Tang government ______________.

olga55 [171]

Answer:

Answer is A. Allotted land according to the land's fertility and the recipients' need.

Explanation:

The Tang government by the Tang dynastyto is known to be the dynasty that attracted international reputation that span through the city.

The Tang dynasty is also described as the golden the age in china history because of the wonderful development that the dynasty brought to the Chinese arts and culture.

It was recorded that the tenure of the Tang dynasty was between 618 - 907 CE.

3 0

2 years ago

What is the relationship between the individual and the state in a communist nation

MrRissso [65]

Answer:

The relationship between the individual and state in a communist nation is that they work in practice and that the government controls every economic decision.

7 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Question 11

Stells [14]

Answer:

C-Right Person

Explanation:

The 8 Path has 8 practices which are: right view, right resolve, right speech, right conduct, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right samadhi. Of those, there isn’t “Right Person”, so the answer would be right person(c).

8 0

3 years ago

An egalitarian society that relies only on wild resources for food and where groups are politically autonomous (independent)?

zmey [24]

Answer:

An egalitarian society that relies only on wild resources for food is a hunter-gatherer society.

Explanation:

Hunter-gatherer societies engage in a subsistence lifestyle that relies on hunting and fishing and foraging for wild vegetation and other foodstuffs that are found in the wild like honey and nuts. This was the principal form of human subsistence until about 12,000 years ago. Hunter-gatherers are politically autonomous because they use mobility as a survival strategy. Although there are few surviving groups who live this way today like the Hadza in Tanzania, hunter-gathers generally live in small bands and move from camp to camp as they follow the available game and search out edible vegetation.

4 0

3 years ago

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged to the laws of civil society, locke invokes the notion of

marissa [1.9K]

In explaining how a person can enter a social contract and be obliged

to the laws of civil society, Locke invokes the notion of "tacit consent." Rawls, who is also a "social contract theorist," of sorts, argues that a social contract can arise only from "hypothetical consent." What is the difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawls's notion of hypothetical consent?

a) Tacit consent requires actually expressing one's consent to the terms of the contract, whereas hypothetical consent simply requires that a citizen would have given consent under certain ideal conditions.

b) One who gives tacit consent implies consent to the terms of the contract through her actions, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent offers her explicit word on the basis of her particular desires.

c) One who gives tacit consent implicitly suggests, through her actions, that she accepts the terms of the contract, whereas to say that someone hypothetically consents means that she would have consented to the terms of the contract were she asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

d) Tacit consent is consent given in the state of nature, whereas hypothetical consent occurs within an ideal society.

e) Tacit consent is consent given by any rational agent, irrespective of her particular desires or ends, whereas someone who gives hypothetical consent agrees to the terms of the contract based on some particular desire that she has.

Answer:

Explanation:

The major difference between Locke's notion of tacit consent and Rawl's notion of hypothetical consent is that unlike tacit consent, someone that hypothetically consents means that the person would have likely consented to the terms of the contract if she was asked to do so under certain ideal conditions.

Tacit consent involves implicitly suggesting through actions that she accepts the terms of the contract.

5 0

3 years ago