1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ki77a [65]
3 years ago
7

Which is an example of environmental stochasticity? Check all that appy

Social Studies
2 answers:
Svetach [21]3 years ago
6 0

Answer: All of the Above

Explanation:

Environmental stochasticity refers to unpredictable spatiotemporal alterations in extrinsic environmental conditions.

However, the variation in population dynamics across patches for the purpose of risk spreading can be described as indication of spatiotemporal flunctuation.

Moreover, activities within a population that are random and unpredicted and are demonstrated by individual behaviors causing migration in or out of a population, is one of effects of spatiotemporal fluctuation in environment.

Furthermore, events such as floods, droughts, and other natural catastrophe that may impose threat to a population spatial distribution, are also important examples of environmental stochasticity

Thus, all the above mentioned environmental effects pose a threat to the population of organims and all can be described as environmental stochasticity.

Snowcat [4.5K]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

1. Variation in individual health that affects likelihood of death.

2. Forest fires that kill large numbers of individuals every 10 to 50 years.

Explanation:

Environmental stoichasticity is an evolution and ecological literature that refers to the unpredictability of  fluctuation on the environment condition at various time and place. It is the unpredictable spatiotemporal fluctuation of the condition of the environment. Here the environment means both biotic and abiotic components of an environment. It reflects the fluctuations that occur in a population of species in a place and over a period of time.

You might be interested in
How is India today similar to and different from what Gandhi envisioned for the country?
REY [17]

Answer:

Eighty years ago, Mahatma Mohandas Gandhi, writing of the India he envisioned and dedicated his life to building, mused that an ideal village would be one that enjoyed ‘perfect sanitation.’

It was no idle wish. Gandhi had seen the danger caused by inadequate sanitation and hygiene. He had seen the disease and subsequent malnourishment it causes, the lives and wellbeing of millions of Indians, especially children and other vulnerable people. He had also seen the impact of open-defecation on the safety and dignity of women and girls. And he understood that these were not only injuring individuals – they were holding back India’s economic and social progress as well.

Today, as the nation and indeed, the world, celebrate Gandhi’s birthday, his dream of perfect sanitation for India may be closer to becoming a reality than ever before.

Explanation:

Three years ago, the Government of India declared war on open defecation, launching the Swachh Bharat – or Clean India – Mission with the ambitious goal of achieving an open defecation-free India by 2019. In a nation where millions of people still lack basic sanitation and hygiene, the goals of SBM may seem unachievable. But the scale and pace of the progress achieved by the thus far is high.

Already, five States and nearly 250,000 villages in 200 districts have been declared open defecation-free – ODF – with more soon to follow. The increase in sanitation facilities is no less impressive: The Government of India reports that latrine coverage has gone from 39 per cent to over 69 per cent. Every hour, an estimated 3300 toilets are being built in India – nearly one toilet every second.

But it’s not enough to build toilets; people need to use them. For this reason, behaviour change is a centerpiece of the Swachh Bharat Mission. The government and its partners are fielding “sanitation armies” to drive community awareness and action. Bollywood stars and cricket legends have joined the effort – including UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador Sachin Tendulkar. Public health initiatives like the UNICEF-supported campaign are breaking through where traditional efforts have failed. In fact, the whole of Indian society is being mobilized to end open defecation.

The Government is leaving nothing to chance. It has put in place a rigorous system to verify not only that a community, district or State is ODF – but that it remains ODF. A recent survey conducted by the Quality Council of India shows that in communities verified as ODF, usage of toilets remained above 91 per cent.

The stakes are very high – and especially for India’s youngest citizens. The World Health Organization estimates that 117,000 Indian children under the age of five died in 2015 from diarrheal diseases caused by unimproved sanitation and hygiene. This represents 22 per cent of the global burden. More than one in three children in India today are , often due to the impact of chronic diarrhea caused by exposure to fecal matter. This affects both their physical and development, undermining their ability to learn and later, to earn a living.

Because ending open-defecation is not only a matter of smart health policy. It is also smart social and economic policy. A 2008 World Bank study showed that the total economic impact of inadequate sanitation in India amounted to US$ 53.8 billion per year – the equivalent of 6.4 per cent of India’s GDP during the same period. UNICEF just completed a study showing that when costs and benefits are compared over a ten-year period, savings realized through improved sanitation exceed costs by 4.3 times – a four-fold return for every rupee spent.

These financial benefits have a direct impact on families. The same UNICEF analysis – based on data from 10,000 households across 12 States – shows that households using a toilet are saving on average around 50,000 rupees (around US$760) per year, realized in medical costs averted, the value of time saved in not needing to seek medical treatment, and the value of deaths averted. For poor rural families in India, this represents a small fortune.

Crucially, the UNICEF study indicates that improving hygiene and sanitation for the poorest households brought the greatest immediate health benefits, since children living in poverty are at the greatest risk of diarrheal diseases, s

and death.

The challenges India still faces to become open-defecation free are substantial. But India is showing that it can be done. And it must. Not only in India, but everywhere that open defecation destroy lives and futures.

If we are serious about realizing the promise of the SDGs, we need to work together to realize Gandhi’s dream – for India and for the world.

6 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is part of the cell theory?
Ksenya-84 [330]

the answer is all of the above :) hope this helps!!

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Explain how "walk-away power" can be used as a negotiating tool.
Inessa05 [86]
When you lose your walk away power<span>, you lose your objectivity. Part of having </span>walk away power<span> means having confidence. Confidence means freedom from doubt; belief in yourself and your abilities. </span>Walk away power<span> does not always mean you </span>walk away<span>. It just means you have a choice.</span>
8 0
3 years ago
What did the U.S. Supreme Court decide in the Brown v. Board of Education case? Why was this an important decision?
Over [174]

Answer:

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that American state laws establishing racial segregation in public schools are unconstitutional, even if the segregated schools are otherwise equal in quality.

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court case that overturned the 'separate but equal' approach to public schooling. ... In its decision, the Supreme Court reversed the 1896 Plessy v. Ferguson case, which originally upheld the 'separate but equal' laws

3 0
3 years ago
Janet tells her son to finish a school assignment before going to bed. However, he wants to sleep right away. Janet says, "I kno
zimovet [89]

Answer:

Authoritative.

Explanation:

An authoritative parenting is that which is characterized by a high responsability, high responsiveness and high demands. This type of parent take care of the child's emotional needs but still have high standars. Like in the example that the exercise provides: Janet knows his son is tired but tells him to finish his assignment (high standars) and offers her help (high responsiveness) and to sleep an extra hour in the morning.

5 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many justices must agree to an opinion for the surpreme court to issue a decision
    15·1 answer
  • What is grievance 28 on the declaration of independence explained in simpler words? <br>Plz Help
    12·1 answer
  • The developmental science term that refers to the skills involved in managing and decoding people's emotions and getting along w
    6·1 answer
  • What impact have immigrants had on the development of the United States in both the past and present?
    15·1 answer
  • S were afraid that more tribes would take away some of their gambling business
    9·1 answer
  • Jefferson, the leader of the Democratic-Republican Party, reduced ____.​
    8·1 answer
  • How to delete a comment in brainly?​
    7·1 answer
  • Who every can guess my birthday on the dot. or is within 5 days away and my age ....within a year I will give you brainliest :)
    10·2 answers
  • Who was bise nsgarchi what did he do​
    5·1 answer
  • When examiners question the reliability of information or inferences they are expected to rely on in their findings, this is an
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!