Unlike liberal critics of Roosevelt’s New Deal, conservative critics generally felt that the New Deal required far too much money, and was hurting the tax payers, who were funding the massive government projects that were intended to get the economy back on track.
Well one relationship would be Hitler fought in both of them for one. They differ because Hitler was a General In WW2 and he was a soldier in WW1. Umm... In WW2, thousands of prisoners were killed in camps, and in WW1 there was not.
(I am pretty sure, I am going off of memory here)
They were also fought differently because there were two different presidents during both wars.
In WW2 was the first base we had ever had bombed, ever in WW1 we didn’t.
There are some similarities and differences there. Hope this helps?
Rockoff estimates the total cost of World War I to the United States at approximately $32 billion, or 52 percent of gross national product at the time. He breaks down the financing of the U.S. war effort as follows: 22 percent in taxes, 58 percent through borrowings from the public, and 20 percent in money creation.
Among these statements, the true religious view is that Hinduism kept the polytheistic view of Aryans. Aryans are known for their development of their polytheistic view. although Hinduism has also more than one God, they believe in one supreme being. Hinduism thus kept the tradition of Aryans provided that they assign different behaviors to several Gods.
The articles of confederation was a weak document that could not call armies, make a law that stuck with the states, create a currency or declare war without states approval...in short it was like a friendship agreement that barely anyone liked and needed to be changed...
