Answer:
Miranda v. Arizona 384 U.S. 436 (1966) is a historical case examined by the Supreme Court. By a decision in this case, the court established that any evidence, whether confessing or exculpatory, can be used in court only if the prosecution can prove that the suspect was informed before the interrogation about the right to a lawyer and about the right not to testify against himself. At the same time, in case of refusal of the suspect from his rights, it is necessary to prove its voluntariness. The Miranda case set a precedent requiring all police departments to inform detainees of their rights to a lawyer and silence. These warnings are called the Miranda rule. The Supreme Court equated the Miranda Rule with constitutional acts.
Explanation:
Answer:
In the daytime/ Afternoon
Explanation:
On the San Jacinto plain between Buffalo Bayou and the San Jacinto River, at about 3 p.m. on April 21, 1836, Gen. Sam Houston began forming his army for a long-awaited assault on the superior forces of Mexican Gen. Antonio Lopez de Santa Anna.
Look it up on google take a picture and it shows your results :)
Answer:Leif Eriksson
Explanation:We know now that Columbus was among the last explorers to reach the Americas, not the first. Five hundred years before Columbus, a daring band of Vikings led by Leif Eriksson set foot in North America and established a settlement.
Hopes this help