Explanation:
Exigence an event or circumstance that engenders rhetoric; the requirement is the one that starts the "loop" of the debate on rhetoric about a specific subject. Purpose: the desired results of (implicitly or explicitly) rhetorical speech defined by the rhetoric.
<span>-Ivan Ilyich questions his past life and accepts his final journey. </span>
Answer:
Probably you should just do something nice for her and see if she does something back to you. If she doesn't then she isn't interested in you. But if she does something nice, she is definitely into you!
Explanation:
There are multiple ways of comparing and contrasting structures that each have different implications and dangers.
1. The back-and-forth method, in which every other sentence compares and contrasts. ie:
P1- theme
-p1 Book A is blah, whereas Book B is blah.
P2- theme
-p2 Book A is blah.... you get the point,
The danger of this method is sounding too redundant, although it does a good job of focusing on the themes.
2. The separate, mixed theme method, in which an entire paragraph is dedicated to each subject, but the themes are thus mixed up within those paragraphs. This method is less redundant but runs the risk of losing clarity of theme.
3. The compare vs. contrast method. This one is fairly straightforward: A paragraph comparing, a paragraph contrasting, and one of synthesis at the end. The pros: It's playing it safe, and it'll work. The cons: It's boring.
Combinations of these 3 methods work as well, it all depends on your personal writing style and the subjects you're comparing.
Good luck
Answer:
just took the test it's ....(They shape public discourse on important ideas and issues)
I help this helps!
Explanation:
