2. Why should one avoid bad deeds?

1 answer:

8 0

One should avoid bad deeds because it is ethically and morally wrong. In a religious perspective it is wrong, for example, to put on a blood transfusion. Based on the article (Accept or Refuse Blood Transfusion) states: Professor Gerhard von Rad has pointed out that Genesis 9:3, 4 “is not an isolated ‘dietary law’ at all . . . but an ordinance for all mankind.” (Genesis—A Commentary, 1961) Remember, too, that in Genesis 9:3-6 the prohibition on blood was linked with God’s statement about man’s having even higher regard for the life of other humans. Rabbi Benno Jacob observed:

“The two prohibitions belong together. . . . The permission to eat meat, but without its blood, and the prohibition against shedding human blood indicate the place of man within the world of the living . . . In summary: the reason for the prohibition of blood is of a moral character. . . . Later Judaism regarded this passage as establishing fundamental ethics for every human being.”

And, In society, it is wrong for a minor to be with a person who is older than themselves, steal, or cheat on a spouse. We avoid bad deeds in order to have a clean conscious, to oblige with society rules, to be ok with others, to not disobey the norms of a law, etc. In conclusion, there are many reason to avoid bad deeds. Be it personal, because of society or religious.

You might be interested in

1. Is Defensible Space Theory a logical explanation for controlling crime? Why or why not?

Kaylis [27]

Answer:

See explaination

Explanation:

1. The Defensible Space Theory can really be seen as a logical explanation for controlling crime from the perspectives of a defender as well as an attacker. This theory makes use of the science of psychology with the science of meaningful space. When the defender, that is, the home owners will be responsible for their home space, the sense of responsibility will be higher on the same. The home owners will be accountable for their defense. This encourages home owners to design their home space in such a way that they will be able to control their environment based on their present capabilities like family structure, income level, and socioeconomic status. The attacker, that is, the potential criminal will feel insecure and uncomfortable on a highly defended land. So, the probability of the criminal attacking the home space or neighborhood may be lessened. This argument is supported by the study which involved private homes in two high-crime areas in St. Louis. These areas recorded lower crimes than public areas using the Defensible Space Theory.

2. According to the Routine Activity Theory, the condition for crime is the presence of a suitable target(s) and the absence of a guardian(s). It is important to note that something or the other will always be present to motivate potential offenders to commit crime. So, there will always be motivated offenders. If motivated offenders are present, so suitable targets will be present in the society on the other side for crime to take place. So, suitable targets cannot be left unguarded which will increase the probability of crime, considering the target is in an isolated position. Even a weak guardian is sometimes equivalent to no guardian or protector. So, I think, presence of guardian(s), more specifically, more capable guardian(s) plays the greatest role at reducing

8 0

3 years ago

Following a vote on a bill in the Arizona State Senate, which of the following scenarios will likely take place? ( I know B is i

pogonyaev

Answer:

The correct answer is A.

3 0

2 years ago

If arrested by private security, Miranda Rights are always provided.<br> False<br> True

fredd [130]

the answers is true true true true true

5 0