1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Savatey [412]
2 years ago
6

A molecule that can be used as a molecular clock has a neutral mutation rate of one mutation per 5 million years. How many years

ago did two species share a common ancestor if the molecules found in these two species differ by a total of eight mutations?
1.5 million years
10 million years
40 million years
20 million years
Biology
2 answers:
gregori [183]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:To put dates on events in evolutionary history, biologists count how many mutations have accumulated over time in a species’ genes. But these “molecular clocks” can be fickle. A paper in the 28 September Physical Review Letters mathematically relates erratic “ticking” of the clock to properties of the DNA sequence. Researchers may eventually use the results to select which genes make the best clocks.

Although mutations in DNA are rare, they are crucial for evolution. Each mutation in a gene changes one small piece of a protein molecule’s structure–sometimes rendering it non-functional and occasionally improving it. The vast majority of mutations, however, neither hurt nor help, often because they affect an unimportant part of their protein. Such a “neutral” mutation usually dies out over the generations, but occasionally one proliferates until virtually every individual has it, permanently “fixing” the mutation in the evolving species.

Over thousands of generations, these fixed mutations accumulate. To gauge the time since two species diverged from a common ancestor, biologists count the number of differences between stretches of their DNA. But different DNA segments (genes) often give different answers, and those answers differ by much more than would be expected if the average rate of mutations remained constant over evolutionary time. Sometimes they also disagree with dates inferred from fossils. Now Alpan Raval, of the Keck Graduate Institute and Claremont Graduate University, both in Claremont, California, has put precise mathematical limits on this variation.

Raval’s work is based on representing possible DNA sequences for a gene as a network of interconnected points or “nodes.” Each point represents a version of the gene sequence that differs by exactly one neutral mutation–a single DNA “letter”–from its immediate neighbors. The network contains only neutral mutations; non-functional versions of the sequence aren’t part of the network.

Models and simulations had suggested that if the number of neighbors varies from point to point–that is, if some sequences allow more neutral mutations than others–mutations accumulate erratically over time, making the molecular clock unreliable. Raval calculates precise limits on how unsteady the clock could get, based on properties of the network, such as the average number of neighbors for each node or the number of “jumps” connecting any two randomly chosen nodes. “The great strength of this paper is that it’s now mathematically worked out in much more detail than before,” says Erik van Nimwegen of the University of Basel and the Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics in Switzerland, who developed the framework that Raval uses.

Still, the relevant network properties are “not very intuitive,” van Nimwegen observes. Raval agrees. “The real question from this point on would be to identify what kinds of proteins would be good molecular clocks.” He says that according to his results, for a protein to be a good clock, “virtually all single mutations [should] be neutral”–many neighbors per node–but “as you start accumulating double and triple mutants, it should quickly become dysfunctional.” Raval is working to relate these network features to protein properties that researchers could measure in the lab.

Researchers have suggested other explanations for the erratic behavior of molecular clocks, such as variations in the mutation rate because of changes in the environment. But such environmental changes are relatively fast, so their effect should average out over evolutionary time, says David Cutler of Emory University in Atlanta. He says that in network models, by contrast, changes in the mutation rate are naturally slow because the point representing the current sequence moves slowly around the network as mutations accumulate.

Explanation:

BartSMP [9]2 years ago
4 0

Answer:

40 million years

Explanation:

because the rate is 1:5m

8:5m*8=40m years

You might be interested in
Which of these terms describes the reaction of a plant to touch?
Cloud [144]

The answer to this question is D

.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In ________ conditioning, the unconditioned stimulus unconditionally elicits a reaction. For example, a bit of black pepper blow
kipiarov [429]

Answer:

The answer is: Classical Conditioning.

Explanation:

  • According to the theory of Classical Conditioning, an Unconditional Stimulus can be defined as such a stimulus that is capable of triggering a response spontaneously and naturally without the requirement of a previous learning or knowledge about the stimulus.
  • A Neutral stimulus can be defined as such a stimulus which is responsible for drawing or focusing the attention of a person to a particular event.
  • A Conditional Stimulus can be defined as such a stimulus which is generated due to the repeated integration of an Unconditional stimulus to a Neutral stimulus. The repeated integration eventually results in the generation of a conditioned response.
  • In the given example, a bit of black pepper blown into the eyes for the first time is an example of unconditional stimulus. This stimulus initiates a spontaneous or unconditional response, that is, blinking of eyes.
  • But, when this unconditional stimulus gets integrated to the neutral stimulus (irritation in the eyes draws the attention of the person) repeatedly, it can result in the generation of a Conditioned Response (blinking of eyes whenever any foreign object gets into it).

7 0
3 years ago
Which statement is not true?
iogann1982 [59]

Answer:

A. Specialized cells are made up of tissues

Explanation:

Cells make up tissues, tissues make up organs, organs make up organ systems and organ systems make up an organism.

All the other options are correct, but cells are not made up of tissues.

Hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
Is 5400000 a scientific notation or standard notation
Reika [66]
It is in standard notation


in scientific notation it would be  is 5.4 x 10^6
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A newborn is suspected of having fetal alcohol syndrome. which finding would the nurse expect to assess?
yan [13]
The answer is A. flattened maxilla.
5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What are the three main factors of the cell theory, and which parts of the previous cell theory can be disproven?
    7·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast streams and rivers<br> Compare and contrast ponds and lakes
    5·2 answers
  • What is gravity and how does it assist in erosion?
    10·1 answer
  • Which perspective most clearly focuses on how we learn observable responses? a psychodynamic b humanistic c evolutionary d biolo
    14·2 answers
  • Does Clorox kill cockroach
    10·2 answers
  • Which biome are succulent plants best suited to live in?
    7·2 answers
  • The table shows the relative size of the genomes (total DNA in the nucleus), number of genes, and number of chromosomes for a va
    11·2 answers
  • The one-toed horse of today steadily evolved from its five-toed ancestor. Which theory of evolution can explain this example?
    5·1 answer
  • Question 4
    9·1 answer
  • Anything that causes disease is called a<br> O virus<br> O protist<br> O pathogen<br> O gene
    11·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!