Answer:
True
Explanation:
Critical thinking is the thinking that deals in analyzing the facts so that the judgment could be created. It involves various things like rationality, non-biased, proof-based on facts provided, etc
Here the factors that directly impact the critical thinking are people, constraints and the consumption this results in shaping your goals and objectives you made
hence, the given statement is true
Sensitivity analysis. Where one variable is being tweaked a little to see the NPV, that is always sensitivity analysis.
Cost per unit
(300,000÷15,000)+20=40
Current profit
50×15,000−40×15,000=150,000
Profit change
60×15,000−40×15,000=300,000
units will knoll need to sell for profit to remain the same as before the price change is
(150,000+300,000)÷40=11,250
Answer:
Check the following explanation
Explanation:
a) Usually a contract has the following elements:
Offer
.
Acceptance
.
Consideration
.
Intention to create a legal relationship
.
In the given case, the intention to create a legal relationship is missing. Though Study had sent a written legal contract to Burrow to affirm the contract, Burrow did not show any interest regarding the same. Hence Burrow can’t be sued for breach of contracts. Moreover the confirmation letter sent by Study does not qualify under the Merchant Memo Rule as the involved parties are not merchants. Burrow can use the terms of UCC for his favour. The UCC states that any contract with value more than $500 must be in writing. As the involved amount in this case is $1300, hence this case does not qualify as a contract under UCC.
b) If Study and Burrow were merchants, then the Merchant Memo Rule gets applicable. Then in that case, if 2 merchants enter into an oral contract, which is worth $500 or more and one of the merchant sends a written confirmation for the same, then a contract will be considered enforceable. In such a case, Burrow will be held liable for breach of contract and can be sued by Study.
