Answer:
20%
Explanation:
The computation of rate of return on the fund is shown below:-
Net assets value at the beginning = Total assets ÷ Number of shares
= $390 million ÷ 15 million
= $26 million
Net assets value at the end of the year = (Total assets - Expenses) ÷ Number of shares
= ($440 million - ($440 million × 2%)) ÷ 16 million
= ($440 million - $8.8 million) ÷ 16 million
= $26.95 million
Now,
Rate of return = (Net assets value at the end of the year - Net assets value at the end of the year + Income distribution + Capital gain distribution) ÷ Net assets value at the beginning
= ($26.95 million - $26 million + $4 per share + $0.25 per share) ÷ $26 million
= $5.2 million ÷ $26 million
= 20%
Answer:
D. Networking ensures higher-paying jobs.
Explanation:
Networking is the act of interacting and sharing information between a group of people with common interests in various settings, such as the work environment, schools, and other social gatherings. When students attend the same school, they share common interests and goals. Networking among them would pave way for possible help in the future with regards to finding a job. But it would be wrong to assume that networking would be a guarantee for higher-paying jobs.
Networking would also help graduates from college to interact with people who have progressed farther in their career than they have. So, they can learn from their wealth of experience.
The value of the best choice is called ' Opportunity Cost' in economics.
Answer:
<h3>
<em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>d</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>'</u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>k</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>i</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>h</u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>v</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>o</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>a</u></em><em><u>n</u></em><em><u>s</u></em><em><u>w</u></em><em><u>e</u></em><em><u>r</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>t</u></em><em><u>o</u></em></h3>
Explanation:
<em>s</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>y</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>g</em><em>a</em><em>i</em><em>n</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em> </em><em>n</em><em>e</em><em>e</em><em>d</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>s</em><em>w</em><em>e</em><em>r</em><em> </em><em>t</em><em>o</em><em>o</em><em>,</em><em>a</em><em>n</em><em>y</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>e</em>
Answer:
$10,125 Favorable
Actual quantity of the cost-allocation base used - Actual quantity of the cost-allocation base that should have been used to produce the actual output) × Budgeted variable overhead cost per unit of the cost-allocation base
Explanation:
Variable overhead spending variance = Actual Spending - budgeted Spending based on actual quantity
Variable overhead spending variance = (Actual Input x Actual rate) - ( Actual input x Budgeted rate)
Variable overhead spending variance = (10,125 x $29) - ( 10,125 x $30)
Variable overhead spending variance = $293,625 - $303,750
Variable overhead spending variance = $10,125 Favorable
Variable overhead spending variance is
Actual quantity of the cost-allocation base used - Actual quantity of the cost-allocation base that should have been used to produce the actual output) × Budgeted variable overhead cost per unit of the cost-allocation base