Answer:
The Square Deal
Throughout American history, political figures have spent a considerable amount of time arguing in favor of capitalism and defending the socio-economic system against critics who emphasize its negative aspects. Yet, while the nation has indeed been successfully built on a capitalist system, we should be careful not to overlook the potential risks and historical abuses of such a system. Capitalism requires a careful balance between economic competition and responsibility, and when these requirements get out of balance, the consequences can be profound and far reaching.
During the Gilded Age of the 19th century (1870-1900) advances in science and technology gave a significant boost to the nation's manufacturing and agricultural industries, but it also ushered in an era of considerable abuses and unfair labor practices. Because competition for employment was strong, and the industries were poorly regulated, corporations and employers frequently took advantage of employees, forcing them to work long hours in unsafe environments, often for insufficient wages. Additionally, the rapid growth of industrial manufacturing was beginning to take a significant toll on the natural environment, as territories became increasingly urban.
During his first term as president (1901-1904), Theodore Roosevelt began promoting a collection of progressive policies which he believed would correct the negative effects of industrialization and improve the quality of life for Americans. These policies, referred to as the Square Deal, focused primarily on controlling corporations, the conservation of nature, and public welfare. Rather than a specific set of policies, the Square Deal refers to many of Roosevelt's policies enacted throughout his presidency.
I would definitely say that it is Not crossing boundaries set by them. <span />
Well I don't know about that but I studied Greece and Rome this month and compared to the Greeks the Romans weren't as good at arts in the golden age as Greece. They were more boisterous and the Greeks had a better democracy and were more organized and knew what they were doing. The Romans were very advanced at other things to such as having very well trained brave and skillful warriors. HOPE I HELPED! If so make ire to thank me!;)
Well the bottom level for the feudal system were system or surfs, they were owned my the land so the did all the farming or ranching, and then the next class was merchant and they traded with other towns or cities, so yes the feudalism did allow for production and trade of goods
Hello. You have not submitted the text to which this question refers. This makes it impossible for your question to be answered. However, I will try to help you in the best possible way.
It is only possible to answer this question by reading the two texts. Also, this is a personal question so first of all, you should reflect on what you think about the dangers that social media can offer to users. Do you think social media can influence you incorrectly? do you think social media can impose negative standards on society? Do you think that social media can promote exaggerated exposure? These are some concepts that you can reflect on to create your opinion about the dangers that social media can cause.
Then, you should read both texts and pay attention to how the authors approach these dangers and which author managed to present an argument that most closely resembles the opinion you have on this subject.
Therefore, you must answer this question by showing how you and this author present similar arguments and opinions.
