Answer:
11.36%
Explanation:
Divide the new price of roast beef with the old one. 7.69 / 5
7.69 ÷ 5 = 1.538
Also divide 1 with the number of years inflation occur
1 ÷ 4 = 0.25
Next, is to raise the first answer gotten to the power of second.
1. 538 ^ 0.25 = 1.113625
Subtract from from 1
1 - 1.1136235 = -0.1136 = - 11.36%
Answer: Moderate or low
Explanation:
Tests of Control are one by auditors to determine the effectiveness of the internal controls in the company in being able to detect accounting errors and anomalies.
If a company seems to have a moderate or low inherent risk the Auditors may or may not initiate Tests of Control due to this reduced risk.
If the company however, has either high or moderate or unusually high risk, the Auditors have to perform Tests of Control to determine where the company is going wrong.
Answer:
Contingency viewpoint or approach of management
Explanation:
According to the contingency viewpoint, there is no particular standard of management. Rather, the type of management style adopted including decisions made depends on the type of situation that the organization is facing at the particular time. Nikita in this scenario is using the contingency approach since she is making decisions based on the upcoming convention.
Answer:
False
Explanation:
The GAAP established that when the benefits of obtaining accounting information are lower than the costs of providing that information, the information should not be provided.
For example, sometimes there are very small differences in certain accounts that don't allow a balance sheet to be balanced. If the accounting error is very small, e.g. just a few hundred dollars, then it is not reasonable to have a whole audit team check all the financial statements again to determine what caused the error. An adjusting entry could be made to close the account balances.
Imagine you are an auditor that must check the physical inventory of a factory and some boxes containing supplies are misplaced. It might take you a whole day to count again all the supplies and materials, but is it worth it? If the supplies were really expensive, probably yes, but if they were cheap components, then probably no.
Answer:
The beta coefficient for Stock L that is consistent with equilibrium
Explanation:
According to Capital Asset Pricing Model, the formula to compute expected rate of return is equals to
Expected rate of return = Risk free rate of return + Beta × (Market risk - risk free rate of return)
where,
rRF = risk free rate of return
rM = market risk
Stock L that is consistent with equilibrium is expected rate of return which equals to = 9.25%
So,
9.25% = 3.6% + Beta × (8.5% - 3.6%)
9.25% = 3.6% + 4.9% Beta
9.25% - 3.6% = 4.9% Beta
5.65% = 4.9% Beta
Beta = 5.65% ÷ 4.9% = 1.15
Hence, the beta coefficient for Stock L that is consistent with equilibrium is 1.15