Answer:
Word of Mouth.
Explanation:
As Magnira Inc. is trying to promote its cosmetics. It offers discounts to customers who post about its products' benefits in their social media accounts. This enables others to know about the company's products. In this case, customers of Magnira Inc. are involved in word of mouth. Word of mouth is considered as more authentic, valid and reliable source of information for the customers. Customers truly believe that its more genuine kind of information which is coming from the customers not the company itself, therefore, customer pay more attention to it and give more weightage to it. Customers do not believe much on the advertisement because they know that ads are being aired by the company itself and it is the paid from but word of mouth are the true and genuine comments and feedback of the customers who have used the brand by themselves.
Answer:
Explanation:
The expenses that Ryan can deduct for the business trips he had is calculated by summing up the expenses he had with regards to gasoline and the depreciation.
Cost of gasoline = (3,760 miles)($1,590/18,800 miles) = $318
Cost of depreciation = $4,800
Adding the costs will give us an answer of $5118.
Answer: $5,118
Answer:
Total product cost= $169,000
Explanation:
<u>The product cost is calculated using the direct material, direct labor, and manufacturing overhead:</u>
<u></u>
Direct materials $ 79,000
Direct labor $ 40,000
Variable manufacturing overhead $ 19,000
Fixed manufacturing overhead 31,000
Total product cost= $169,000
Answer: a.fixed factory overhead volume variance.
Explanation:
Fixed overhead costs are the costs that are incurred by an organization that doesn't change even when the lre is a change in the volume of production activity. The fixed overhead costs are vital in order for the effective operation of the company.
When the standard fixed overhead rate is based on full capacity, the cost of available but unused productive capacity is indicated by the a.fixed factory overhead volume variance.
Answer:
B) No, because she can get similar hammers elsewhere.
Explanation:
When someone sues for specific performance he/she is asking the court to order the defendant to complete performance the contract. They are not suing to recover any damages that may have resulted from the breaching of the contract.
In this case, Nicole would have probably been able to sue Tyler for some type of compensatory damages, but since the hammers are such a common good, it would be very difficult for her to obtain an specific performance order.
