Answer:
integrated programs are usually way more effective than programs that are not integrated
Explanation:
According to my research on different marketing techniques, I can say that the efforts need to be integrated because integrated programs are usually way more effective than programs that are not integrated. This is because integrated efforts will reach a wider audience which will lead to more sales.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
The relationship between the straight-line and double-declining-balance method is that they D. Produce the same total depreciation over an asset's useful life.
<h3>How are the straight-line and double-declining-balance methods related?</h3>
While they do not produce the same depreciation every year, they will eventually depreciate an asset in the same way overtime.
What this means is that both methods will depreciate an asset by the same amount at the end of the asset's life. However, the depreciation amounts will vary by method on an annual basis.
In conclusion, option D is correct.
Find out more on depreciation methods at brainly.com/question/26948130.
Answer: For residential rental property, the recovery period using GDS is 27.5 years. 2 If you use ADS, the recovery period for the same type of property is 30 years if it was placed in service after December 31, 2017, or 40 years if it was placed in service before that date.
Explanation: Is the good enough???
Answer:
Amount investment in Sock Y = - $126,000
Beta of portfolio = 1.636
Explanation:
Data provided in the question:
Total amount to be invested = $140,000
Stock X Y
Expected return 14% 10%
Beta 1.42 1.18
Expected return of portfolio = 17.6%
Now,
let the weight invested n stock X be W
therefore,
Weight of Stock Y = 1 - W
thus,
( W × 14% ) + (1 - w) × 10% = 17.6
%
or
14W + 10% - 10W = 17.6%
or
4W = 7.6
or
W = 1.9
Therefore,
weight of Y = 1 - 1.9 = -0.9
Thus,
Amount investment in Sock Y = Total amount to be invested × Weight
= 140,000 × ( - 0.9 )
= - $126,000 i.e short Y
Beta of portfolio = ∑ (Beta × Weight)
= [ 1.42 × 1.9 ] + [ 1.18 × (-0.9) ]
= 2.698 - 1.062
= 1.636
