Answer:
Mexico's economy relies heavily on the United States as an export market. The value of exports equaled 39% of Mexico's GDP in 2019, as shown in Table 1, and approximately 80% of Mexico's exports were headed to the United States.
Explanation:
True is the correct answer to this question
Answer:
There Are Many
Explanation:
One main difference is the job description. A Clinical psychologists work to reduce psychological distress in people with mental or physical health problems. Clinical psychologists with substantial and appropriate experience may be called upon to act as expert witnesses and write legal reports or documents. These are who deal with the dirty work and take care of the known factors. A counseling psychologist is a more humanistic approach and personally discusses with the patient issues that are going on and how to potentially solve them. The are more on call and a crutch for people who need help.
Answer:
The Sangama Dynasty of Vijaynagar empire was established by Harihara I and first Bukka Ray.
Explanation:
Answer: Ultramares corporation v. Touche established Ultramares doctrine. Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that scienter is required before CPAs can be held liable.
Explanation:
All the options except the above are true. Ultramares corporation v. Touche did establish the Ultramares doctrine.
United States v. Natelli sentenced two CPAs to prison for a year, in addition to fines, for violating the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Bily v. Arthur Young did not uphold the restatement doctrine. The restatement doctrine restatement doctrine makes an auditor liable to people who rely on the quality of his work be they his clients or third parties. Two high courts ruled that auditors are not liable to third parties who use their work but only to the party that contracted their work.
However, Hochfelder v. Ernst & Ernst ruled that an allegation of scienter (an intention to deceive) is not required before CPAs can be held liable as long as the actions constitute actual deception.
While rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act states the presence of scienter as a requirement to commit an offense, the court ruled against the statute by eliminating the Scienter clause from criminal statute and ruled against Ernst & Ernst.
