Answer:
B. restricted the ability of competitors to engage in cooperative agreements
Explanation:
The Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 is a US legislation that regulates the level of competition that exists among businesses. It was passed by the Congress when Benjamin Harrison was president. This act is aimed at protecting trade and commerce from illegal restraints and monopolies. It was enacted by the 51st Congress of the United States. This act was introduced by John Sherman in the senate house.
Answer:
$45
Explanation:
A surplus is when income exceeds expenses.
One year has 52 weeks. If one week was unpaid leave, then payments were received for 51 weeks.
Average payments per week = $615
Total earning per week =$615 x 51
=$31,365
The total expenses for the year were $31,320. The surplus amount will be income minus expenses
= $31,365 - $31,320
=$45
Answer:
The amount of dividend received by common stockholders in 2017 = $7500
Explanation:
The preference shares are cumulative which means the 2015 dividend on cumulative preference shares will be paid in the next year when dividend is declatred.
The total dividend on preference shjares is = 2500 * 100 * 0.05 = $12500
In 2016 dividend of 22500 is declared and paid.
Out of this 22500, 12500 relates to prefernece dividend for 2015.
The remaining 10000 relates to 2016 preference dividend. Thus, 2500 of 2016 preference dividned is outstanding and will be paid in 2017.
In 2017 out of 22500, 15000 (12500 + 2500) dividendd is paid to preference share holders.
The amount of dividend received by common stockholders in 2017 = 22500 - 15000 = $7500
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question is incomplete because it does not attach the model to answer it we can comment on the following.
The problem is that Jamal, trying to increase profits, decided to sell two different products that are not part of the Subway products. When the franchisor visited Jamal's location, it realized the changes and set an ultimatum to Jamal to respect the franchise agreement.
The cause of the problem is that although Jamal wanted to diversify the products to have more income, this contradicts and is against the franchise agreement he signed when he bought the Subway franchise. The contract clearly states that the owner of the franchise can only sell products authorized in the contract by Subway. That is exactly one of the characteristics of a franchise. That you visit one of them any place in the world, and you are going to find de the same products with the same quality. That is the product guarantee of a franchise like Subway.
So the effects for the company are that its reputation an image can be questioned for selling different products that are hot approved by Subway. It is a major risk the company is not going to allow. Furthermore, it is stated in the contract. So Jamal has no right to break it.
One possible solution is that Jamal respects those 30 days to make the proper corrections, follow the guidelines established in the Subway's manuals, offer a sincere apology, and commit himself to operate the franchise just as it is stated on the agreement.
That would be:
B.) Defualt
