Why so that saying did correct answe right I don’t know the answer I am just answering to see something about my points because they are negative and I am trying something
Answer:
13.86%
Explanation:
34% was invested into stock X with an expected return of 11%
22% was invested into stock Y with an expected return of 18%
44% was invested into stock Z with an expected return of 14%
The expected return on the portfolio can be calculated using the formula below
Expected return= Sum of ( weight of stock×return of stock)
= (0.34×11%)+(0.22×18%)+(0.44×14%)
= 3.74+3.96+6.16
= 13.86%
Hence the expected return on the portfolio is 13.86%
Answer:
(B) Advice the production and purchasing department to produce or order smaller quantities of products.
Explanation:
According to my research on basic economics and business owning I can say that the best thing for Georgia to do in this situation in order to help her company become more value driven is to Advice the production and purchasing department to produce or order smaller quantities of products. This is because since product is not selling fast enough they should sell what they already have before producing more, otherwise they will be wasting money on products which will eventually cause them to be overflowing stock. Thus losing money.
I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at Brainly.
Answer:
Correctly ignored a sunk cost.
Explanation:
In economics a sunk cost is one that an individual has already paid for and cannot recover. For example when payment is made for rent it is no longer recoverable.
In this instance Eric has already bought a $50 ticket that is nonrefundable, nonexchangeable, and nontransferable. This is a sunk cost.
Eric wants to go to the concert with Ginny who he wanted to date for a long time.
He will correctly ignore the sunk cost of going to the play because any more time spent on the play will not help recover the $50 already spent.
Answer:
Self Interest & Invisible Hand of Laissez Faire Policy
Explanation:
Adam Smith Laissez Faire Policy - suggests that free markets are the best approach for welfare maximisation of a society, based on self interest guiding best decisions by individuals, and individual wealth & welfare maximisation implies society wealth & welfare maximisation.
The Invisible Hand of free markets corrects all the discrepancies (if any), re-guides self interest forming the basis of over all social interest. Government intervention is unnecessary & distortionary as per the theory
