Answer:
The US stated that the intent was to remove "a regime that developed and used weapons of mass destruction, that harbored and supported terrorists, committed outrageous human rights abuses, and defied the just demands of the United Nations and the world. For the invasion of Iraq the rationale was "the United States relied on the authority of UN Security Council Resolutions 678 and 687 to use all necessary means to compel Iraq to comply with its international obligations".
I hope this helps a little bit.
Analyzing the scenario, we see that the situation is repeated by the second. It may be that the first time, the woman did not know. But she had already been accused before, that is, that the second time, this was considered intentional and malicious conduct.
According to the penal code § 594, this act is considered vandalism, that is the defacing of another’s property with graffiti “or other inscribed material,” or damaging or destroying another’s property and this cant be done negligently, with the will to do the damage.
If she convicted of felony vandalism again, the maximum prison sentence is three years (after being convicted before) and fines can be up to $10,000. When the damage caused by the vandalism exceeds $10,000, the fines can be increased to $50,000. Then, comes the restitution (paying the owner property for the damage), and possibly community service.
Answer:
Social status was achieved through family associations and through military conquests.
Explanation:
Some families within the trobos had prestige and reputation either through wealth or military conquests. This allowed people born into these families to achieve great social status. When these people married other individuals, these individuals enjoyed the same social status and reputation as their spouses.
Military battles on the other hand, promoted the rise of promising and successful warriors who achieved achievements for their tribe. This also promoted the rise of war heroes to high and distinct social status.
