1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
arsen [322]
3 years ago
8

Members of the millennial generation are continuing to be dependent on their parents (either living with or otherwise receiving

support from parents) into early adulthood (the Enquirer, March 16, 2014). a family research organization has claimed that, in past generations, no more than 30% of individuals aged 18 to 32 continued to be dependent on their parents. Suppose that a sample of 400 individuals aged 18 to 32 showed that 136 of them continue to be dependent on their parents. a. Develop hypotheses for a test to determine whether the proportion of millennial continuing to be dependent on their parents is higher than for past generations. b. What is your point estimate of the proportion of millennials that are continuing to be dependent on their parents? c. What is the p-value provided by the sample data? d. What is your hypothesis testing conclusion? use alpha = .05 as the level of significance.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Morgarella [4.7K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

a)

\bf H_0: The mean of adults aged 18 to 32 that continue to be  dependent on their parents is 0.3

\bf H_a: The mean of adults aged 18 to 32 that continue to be  dependent on their parents is greater than 0.3

b) 34%

c) practically 0

d) Reject the null hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

a)

Since an individual aged 18 to 32 either continues to be dependent on their parents or not, this situation follows a Binomial Distribution and, according to the previous research, the probability p of “success” (depend on their parents) is 0.3 (30%) and the probability of failure q = 0.7

According to the sample, p seems to be 0.34 and q=0.66

To see if we can approximate this distribution with a Normal one, we must check that is not too skewed; this can be done by checking that np ≥ 5 and nq ≥ 5, where n is the sample size (400), which is evident.

<em>We can then, approximate our Binomial with a Normal </em>with mean

\bf np = 400*0.34 = 136

and standard deviation

\bf \sqrt{npq}=\sqrt{400*0.34*0.66}=9.4742

Since in the current research 136 out of 400 individuals (34%) showed to be continuing dependent on their parents:

\bf H_0: The mean of adults aged 18 to 32 that continue to be  dependent on their parents is 0.3

\bf H_a: The mean of adults aged 18 to 32 that continue to be  dependent on their parents is greater than 0.3

So, this is a r<em>ight-tailed hypothesis testing. </em>

b)

According to the sample the proportion of "millennials" that are continuing to be dependent on their parents is 0.34 or 34%

c)

Our level of significance is 0.05, so we are looking for a value \bf Z^* such that the area under the Normal curve to the right of \bf Z^* is ≤ 0.05

This value can be found by using a table or the computer and is \bf Z^*= 1.645

<em>Applying the continuity correction factor (this should be done because we are approximating a discrete distribution (Binomial) with a continuous one (Normal)), we simply add 0.5 to this value and </em>

\bf Z^* corrected is 2.145

Now we compute the z-score corresponding to the sample

\bf z=\frac{\bar x -\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}

where  

\bf \bar x= mean of the sample

\bf \mu= mean of the null hypothesis

s = standard deviation of the sample

n = size of the sample

The sample z-score is then  

\bf z=\frac{136 - 120}{9.4742/20}=16/0.47341=33.7759

The p-value provided by the sample data would be the area under the Normal curve to the left of 33.7759 which can be considered zero.

d)

Since the z-score provided by the sample falls far to the left of  \bf Z^* we should reject the null hypothesis and propose a new mean of 34%.

You might be interested in
5. Using the factor tree, What are the prime factors of 36
alex41 [277]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

A factor tree is not unique for a given number. Instead of expressing 36 as 2 × 18, we can express 36 as 6 × 6. Prime factorization of 36 using factor tree method is 2 × 2 × 3 × 3 = 2² × 3².

7 0
3 years ago
12 over 65.4 = 24 over x (12/65.4=24/x) What is x?
Tpy6a [65]
The answer is 130.8 hope it helps
7 0
3 years ago
Brian and Zach went to Village Grille for lunch. Brian‟s lunch cost $4 less than 3 times Zach‟s. The total cost for lunch was $2
Nesterboy [21]

Answer:The cost for zachs lunch is 12$, and the cost for brins is 8$

Step-by-step explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Which line is parallel to a line whose slope is 2/5
Vera_Pavlovna [14]
3,-4
1,-8
Possible parrellell lines of the slope
4 0
3 years ago
Please help fast asap
Lena [83]

Answer: 47 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

7x-9=4x+15 because of the vertical angle rule

7x-9=4x+15

3x=24

x= 8

So the angle 7(8)-9 = 47°

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How to you figure out tax rate? for example, 52.25 what an 8% sales tax
    12·2 answers
  • How would adding 0 affect the mean and median​
    7·1 answer
  • What is the answer to what is the answer to 6X + 21 + 14
    5·2 answers
  • Look at the attachment and help me I will give brainlyist
    12·2 answers
  • Let f(x) be a func. satisfying f(-x)=f(x) for all real x.if f"(x) exist, find its value.
    6·1 answer
  • To convert a fraction into a decimal number, divide the denominator by the numerator.
    13·2 answers
  • Plz plz plz help i'll give 10pts <br> DON'T ANSWER WITH A LINK :)
    12·1 answer
  • Subtraction (must show work) 1. d - 27 = 45 2. h - 114 = 28
    10·1 answer
  • Which equation results from adding the equations in this system?
    7·1 answer
  • Why it is very important to follow the steps in solving an equation with 2 or more operations involve?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!