Answer:
D. uses both inductive and deductive reasoning at the same time.
Explanation:
This logical fallacy occurs when it is assumed that one thing caused another when the two events happen sequentially.
The answer is Agression , and violence.
The main difference between the two acts is not in the actions per se, but in Agression, the perpetrator may not really intended to harm others because his/her actions derived from their personal egos in order to appear as capable in order to increase their value. In violence on the other hands, the perpetrators tend to have a big intention to cause harms to their target.
Full of excitement, today was an excellent day, up until I got into a huge argument with my friend, while I kept a gentle temperament he/she did not do the same.
D. Instead of giving in to death , people should fight against it.
"Rage, rage against the dying of the light."
