I believe that judges should not be elected. If we were elected, it could prove to be more difficult to remain completely unbiased. If we were elected by the people, their arguments and opinions could influence decisions. Therefore, by being appointed by the president, judges can remain unbiased and completely fair, which will produce the best outcomes in the court of law.
In general, government that followed the idea of laissez-faire in economic matters would not regulate business, or ensure that there was fair competition existing in the market place, since they would be rather "hands off" in the economy.
It was controversial mainly for two reasons: Because it involved the abortion attempt of a young woman who was a physical and emotions abuse victim, who had also lied to authorities in Texas in order to get a legal abortion. Public opinion was largely divided on the issue. Conservatives blamed the woman and Democrats blamed the existing laws that prevented women from aborting.
The second reason was judicial: many people considered that the Constitution was being misinterpreted to adjust to shifting social mores. For these dissenters, there was no legal justification of any kind to authorize abortion as a Constitutional right.
<span>The New York Times "ethicist" contest call into the question the assumption that it is natural and right to eat meat by asking people to write persuasive arguments in favor of eating meat.</span>
Margaret sanger was the 1st person to do this
