Gezon and Kottak argue that the relatively high incidence of expanded family households among poorer North Americans is
"an adaptation to poverty".
A significantly more typical response from researchers, in any case, was to recommend that discussing the way of life of the underclass was commensurate to "faulting the victim." Bad conduct and poor decisions, in this view, were a justifiable adaptation to poverty and the absence of chance in individuals' lives. In spite of the fact that my examination on the underclass was given a neighborly gathering, the greater part of the scholarly network has mixed around the view that awful practices are a result, as opposed to a reason, of poverty.
I'd go for Order and Stability. A is not normally found intrinsically in religious beliefs or phisophies of life, C is a tenant of Christianity and D is related to economy and history.
Answer:
2m^5 +9m + 6n^4
Explanation:
(6n^4 + 1) + (2m^5 + 9m - 1)
(remove parenthesis)
= 6n^4 + 1 + 2m^5 + 9m - 1
(1 - 1 = 0)
=2m^5 + 9m + 6n^4
Hope my answer helps :)
I'm not very good at explaining, but I do know the process.
