1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nadusha1986 [10]
3 years ago
10

Which person most directly affected voting rights for women?

Social Studies
2 answers:
prohojiy [21]3 years ago
7 0
<span>The person most directly affected voting rights for women was Carrie Chapman Catt. Carrie Chapman Catt was an American women's suffrage leader who campaigned for the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which gave U.S. women the right to vote in 1920.</span>
FrozenT [24]3 years ago
3 0

Susan B. Anthony - for apex

You might be interested in
What do all three of the signers have named after them
mylen [45]

Answer:

What signers?

Explanation:

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Advertising influences all of the following except
Sunny_sXe [5.5K]

Answer: it’s C. Our individualism

Explanation:

I got that

3 0
3 years ago
What does the Preamble promise to do for the people of this country? How has it succeeded, and how has it failed?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

The Preamble of the U.S. Constitution—the document’s famous first fifty-two words— introduces everything that is to follow in the Constitution’s seven articles and twenty-seven amendments. It proclaims who is adopting this Constitution: “We the People of the United States.” It describes why it is being adopted—the purposes behind the enactment of America’s charter of government. And it describes what is being adopted: “this Constitution”—a single authoritative written text to serve as fundamental law of the land. Written constitutionalism was a distinctively American innovation, and one that the framing generation considered the new nation’s greatest contribution to the science of government.

The word “preamble,” while accurate, does not quite capture the full importance of this provision. “Preamble” might be taken—we think wrongly—to imply that these words are merely an opening rhetorical flourish or frill without meaningful effect. To be sure, “preamble” usefully conveys the idea that this provision does not itself confer or delineate powers of government or rights of citizens. Those are set forth in the substantive articles and amendments that follow in the main body of the Constitution’s text. It was well understood at the time of enactment that preambles in legal documents were not themselves substantive provisions and thus should not be read to contradict, expand, or contract the document’s substantive terms.  

But that does not mean the Constitution’s Preamble lacks its own legal force. Quite the contrary, it is the provision of the document that declares the enactment of the provisions that follow. Indeed, the Preamble has sometimes been termed the “Enacting Clause” of the Constitution, in that it declares the fact of adoption of the Constitution (once sufficient states had ratified it): “We the People of the United States . . . do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

Importantly, the Preamble declares who is enacting this Constitution—the people of “the United States.” The document is the collective enactment of all U.S. citizens. The Constitution is “owned” (so to speak) by the people, not by the government or any branch thereof. We the People are the stewards of the U.S. Constitution and remain ultimately responsible for its continued existence and its faithful interpretation.

It is sometimes observed that the language “We the People of the United States” was inserted at the Constitutional Convention by the “Committee of Style,” which chose those words—rather than “We the People of the States of . . .”, followed by a listing of the thirteen states, for a simple practical reason: it was unclear how many states would actually ratify the proposed new constitution. (Article VII declared that the Constitution would come into effect once nine of thirteen states had ratified it; and as it happened two states, North Carolina and Rhode Island, did not ratify until after George Washington had been inaugurated as the first President under the Constitution.) The Committee of Style thus could not safely choose to list all of the states in the Preamble. So they settled on the language of both “We the People of the United States.”

Nonetheless, the language was consciously chosen. Regardless of its origins in practical considerations or as a matter of “style,” the language actually chosen has important substantive consequences. “We the People of the United States” strongly supports the idea that the Constitution is one for a unified nation, rather than a treaty of separate sovereign states. (This, of course, had been the arrangement under the Articles of Confederation, the document the Constitution was designed to replace.) The idea of nationhood is then confirmed by the first reason recited in the Preamble for adopting the new Constitution—“to form a more perfect Union.” On the eve of the Civil War, President Abraham Lincoln invoked these words in support of the permanence of the Union under the Constitution and the unlawfulness of states attempting to secede from that union.

The other purposes for adopting the Constitution, recited by the Preamble— to “establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity”—embody the aspirations that We the People have for our Constitution, and that were expected to flow from the substantive provisions that follow. The stated goal is to create a government that will meet the needs of the people.

Explanation:

Your welcome

6 0
2 years ago
More women have pet cats than men.
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Answer:

naturalistic observation

8 0
2 years ago
Academic integrity refers to
iragen [17]

Answer:

i would say b, all academic work

Explanation:

hope this helps, branliets plzz

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Identify each trait as typical of either a church, which has a low-tension relationship with its social surroundings, or a sect,
    10·1 answer
  • Please help with all please
    6·1 answer
  • WILL MARK AS BRAINLIEST!!!!!!! What kind of homeland the Israelites were likely to create in Canaan. DO NOT SEARCH UP!!!!!
    12·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between politically affiliated and independent PACs with regard to how they are regulated and how much
    10·1 answer
  • Mention any four changes that took place recently in your society.​
    6·1 answer
  • PLEASE HURRY 20 POINTSSSSSSSS
    14·2 answers
  • Does preserving your own beauty seem like a good reason to have kids
    15·1 answer
  • do you agree or disagree with george santayna, a spanish-american philospher, poet and humanist, he said" a child educated only
    10·1 answer
  • 5. What are four pieces of evidence Alfred Wegener used to support his theory of continental drift? (4 points).
    14·1 answer
  • gait and cognition: the relationship between gait stability and variability with executive function in persons with and without
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!