– Trench Warfare was not very effective because it caused a stalemate between the sides.
<u>Further Explanation:-
</u>
<u>The feature of the western world which effected the way of fighting the war was the development of Trench Warfare. Once the war-related to ‘Race to Sea' got over, the conflict was now shifted to holding on to positions. To hold on to the positions,</u> The army wanted to keep themselves out from firing range of machine guns and for that, Soldiers had to dig down into defensive positions and that was when the trenches were introduced. The trenches were dug along the length along the front and it was very clear that these hastily dug ditches were made to be permanent and because of that, they involved into complex systems which were defensive on both the sides and the area which was opposing to this trenches was known as 'no Man's land'.<u> Trench warfare was considered as deadlier for attackers then defenders and attackers suffered twice the causalities during an assault on the trench line of Enemy. Because of all these attackers faced during an assault, The western front became one of the Stalemate.
</u>
Learn more:
1. According to Roger Williams, how did the English usually justify their attacks on the Indians?
<u>brainly.com/question/4891530
</u>
2. How did congress approach reconstruction after the civil war?
<u>brainly.com/question/507264
</u>
Grade – High School
Subject – History
Chapter – Trench Warfare
Keywords –Trench Warfare, Causalities, Assault, Attack, Defenders, Stalemate, Western Front, Soldiers, Guns, Defensive Positions, Ditches.
Answer:
Secondary sources provide second-hand information and commentary from other researchers. Examples include journal articles, reviews, and academic books. A secondary source describes, interprets, or synthesizes primary sources.
and
Primary sources provide a first-hand account of an event or time period and are considered to be authoritative. They represent original thinking, reports on discoveries or events, or they can share new information.
In conclusion, Primary and Secondary sources are different because Primary sources are like Anne Franks Diary, which i an autobiography
and a Secondary Source would be a Biography written about her by someone else. <u>It is better to trust Primary sources rather than Secondary sources, Secondary sources are can be right but you never know</u>
<u></u>
<u>Can i please have brainliest though??</u>
Answer:
(a) He introduced Christianity.
Explanation: just answered on edgeunuity and got it right
Answer:
I will write only facts as they are presented through historic methods
Explanation:
Given that it is true that, bias and interpretation can influence an individual's perspective as an observer. To avoid this interpretation bias, it is better to write only facts as they are presented through historic methods. This implies that individuals should have or seek the facts and establish them appropriately without settling for personal understanding, Opinions should not serve as a basis for analyzed data. Hence, it is advisable to get the first-hand documents to avoid biases from the documents at hand.
Therefore, bias and interpretation can influence my perspective as an observer, so I will write only facts as they are presented through historic methods.
