Which of the following is the most valid historical documentation: Group of answer choices artifacts because these are not open
to interpretation. primary sources, these are indisputable because they come from individuals that were present at the historical event. religious documents like the Bible are the best source. government records are best because these do not include personal opinions. none of the above. Two or more dependable sources that record the same event using the same facts is needed to establish historical accuracy.
Two or more dependable sources that record the same event using the same facts is needed to establish historical accuracy.
Explanation:
Artifacts can be open to interpretation because historians need to figure out what they are & what they mean about life in the time they were made.
Although primary sources are helpful, they are not indisputable because one person cannot completely confirm an event. Consider what would happen if future historians only used a conspiracy theorist's journal to figure out what life in our current time is like.
Religious documents often record fictional events.
<u>Two or more dependable sources is the right answer because more resources mean that something is more likely to be true.</u>
Answer: They wished to remain out of the conflict. ... The First Bank of the United States allowed the government to produce money, establish credit, and: Control the flow of money.
