Answer:
community partnerships with organizations and citizens
Explanation:
Tariff is a kind of tax, import quotas is a limitation on the number of objects that can be imported and embargo is the prohibition of import: the correct answer is:
<span>A. limiting the goods brought into a country.</span>
La respuesta correcta para esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Nos pides escribir un párrafo relacionado con el nombre del proyecto:(CIENCIA DIVERTIDA DESDE CASA), que tenga seis oraciones.
Bueno, pues aquí está:
Ahora que estamos tomando clases desde casa, qué mejor manera de aprovechar el tiempo que con un proyecto científico. La ventaja de este proyecto es que lo podemos hacer desde la comodidad del hogar. Y es que en realidad, en casa tenemos todos los implementos necesarios para realizarlo. Mi papá tiene un cuarto de herramientas donde arregla lo que se descompone en la casa. Él guarda de todo en ese cuarto y tiene suficientes herramientas y materiales para el proyecto de ciencia divertida. Ahora que ya se que tengo los materiales y la ayuda de mi papa, estoy listo para empezar mi actividad de ciencia divertida, con la ayuda de mis hermanos, mientras mi mamá nos grita que no hagamos destrozos.
Answer: D. Although the mere teaching of something bad was not considered dangerous, if it was not advocated or planned its implementation, as was ruled in one case, the <em>federal law considers a crime</em> <em>teaching a desired attack</em> <em>to overtrow the government of the United States</em>. The production and spread of a video encouraging an armed attack<em> is an example of seditious speech</em>.
Answer:
Admissible as a voluntary statement when the subject was neither in custody nor interrogated for purposes of Miranda
Explanation:
In US law, the Miranda warning refers to a statement that must be giving by law enforcement officers whenever a subject is put into custody, letting them know that they have a right to remain silent. This is in order to protect the suspect from forced self-incrimination, as established in the Fifth Amendment. Failure to remind the suspect of their Miranda rights means that any information disclosed by the suspect can't be admissible in a court of law. However, in our case, the suspect walked in voluntarily and confessed to the crime out of his own volition and without any coercion from us. <u>This statement is admissible, as it was provided by the suspect without him being in custody or under interrogation</u>, so you didn't have to recite the Miranda warning to him.
