1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Vlad [161]
3 years ago
10

There are two general types of evidence, what are they called?

Law
1 answer:
zloy xaker [14]3 years ago
4 0
It’s C Physical and testimonial if I’m not mistaking
You might be interested in
Jin monitors and enforces security in courts of law. His job title is best described as
Natalka [10]
Bailiff, prosecutor, ranger, forensic scientist
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What would be the likely punishment for a crime classified as a misdemeanor by the California Penal Code?
Darya [45]

Answer:

“Standard” California misdemeanors, punishable by up to 6 months in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000; 1and. “Gross” or “aggravated” misdemeanors,” punishable by up to 364 days in jail and/or a fine of up to $1,000 or more.

8 0
3 years ago
Even if a declarant gives a statement to police concerning an alleged crime, that statement could still qualify as non-testimoni
alisha [4.7K]

Courts applying the Davis exception most often summarize it with phrases such as "ongoing emergency" or "emergency situation." When police are responding to an ongoing emergency, their motive is to ensure the safety of all concerned, not to collect evidence. The Supreme Court ruled in Davis that statements elicited by police while responding to an ongoing emergency are not testimonial for purposes of the Confrontation Clause.

Testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-ITlooks like the kind of testimony that would be offered at trial in aid of prosecution;

-It is made when the circumstances objectively indicate that there is no ongoing emergency; and

-The primary purpose of the interrogation is to establish or prove past events potentially relevant to a later criminal prosecution.

The Confrontation Clause of the United States Constitution protects the right of a criminal defendant to be confronted by his or her accusers in Court and to cross-examine any testimony that they may offer. The admission of hearsay (an out-of-court statement) – even if admissible under an exception to the rule against hearsay – can be in direct conflict with the right of Confrontation.

On the other hand, “non-testimonial” hearsay is a statement that:

-It is made primarily for the purpose of assisting police to meet an ongoing emergency; or

-It was made primarily for a purpose other than discovering, establishing or proving past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecution.

To learn more about Testimony visit here ; brainly.com/question/29244222?referrer=searchResultssearchResults

#SPJ4

4 0
1 year ago
Discuss THREE contributing factors that led to human rights violation that you have chosen<br>​
Roman55 [17]
Poverty, lack of education, and lack of law enforcement.
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What does it mean if a crime is a conspiracy?
ad-work [718]

Answer: The answer is C

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the arm signal for a left turn?​
    6·1 answer
  • Handout 1B: My Day in Court, But Which One?
    8·1 answer
  • Cars are only as safe as their driver, so _____ is your best bet to lower your risk.
    11·2 answers
  • HELP ASAP.
    5·1 answer
  • Upon a person's fourth DUI conviction,______ is mandatory
    8·1 answer
  • In the democracy, what the majority wants is often reflected in policy. Explain two roles of the media in the policy making proc
    15·1 answer
  • What type of fertilization occurs when the female releases eggs into the water or attaches them to a plant or rock and the male
    15·2 answers
  • What can happen if the president chooses to veto a law
    11·1 answer
  • isaiah wants to build a new shopping complex. he is afraid that once news gets out about his plans, the price of the land where
    10·1 answer
  • Individuals who cannot afford an attorney have a constitutional right to have one appointed to them. Which Supreme Court case wa
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!