Incomplete question. The remaining part of the question reads;
The city of Beautifica has established a lovely park in the city. The city council wishes to preserve some elements of nature, undisturbed by city noise, traffic, pollution, and crowding. The park is a place where citizens can go and find grass, trees, flowers, and quiet. In addition, there are playgrounds and picnic areas, and at one time a road ran through the park. Now the road is closed. The city council has enacted a law requiring that all entrances to the park have the following signposted: NO VEHICLES IN THE PARK.
<em>The law seems clear, but some disputes have arisen over its interpretation. Interpret the law in the following cases, keeping in mind what the law says (the letter of the law) as well as the legislative intent. Examine the situation and decide whether or not the vehicle described should be allowed in the park. </em>
Tony lives on one side of the city and works on the other. He will save ten minutes if he drives through the park.
Answer:
<u>Tony should not be allowed.</u>
Explanation:
We can make this conclusion because Tony's reasons constitute part of the reasons why the park was closed from vehicles; in other to be undisturbed by traffic or pollution from vehicles.
Hence, it will be reasonable for Tony to use other means of transportation such as a bicycle to go through the park.
