The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, you forgot to attach the options for this question.
However, doing some research we can say the following.
The view of the origin of life argues that God created the natural laws of the universe and the building blocks of life with the eventual emergence of life in mind, but then He stepped back, let creation unfold naturally, and life eventually emerged from non-living material. We are talking about progressive creationism.
Douglass R. Groothu was a proponent of progressive creationism, Groothuis thinks that traditional views, such as the doctrine of creation ex nihilo and the special creation of Adam and Eve, are flexible in their specifics.
Douglass R. Groothuis is an American philosopher that has dedicated part of his research to investigate moral and ethical issues in modern societies and how this affects the culture and traditions of people. One is his recent works is how the internet has changed people's behavior and affected the way they live.
Answer: Charismatic leaders are self confident and charming
.
Transformational leaders use ideas to gain support
.
Explanation:
Charismatic leaders are interesting people to whom people are naturally drawn. They use this skill to lead people, knowing that they give off a sense of self confidence that inspires the confidence of others. In contrast, transformational leaders find a shared value or idea and use that to gain the support of their followers.
The two styles are similar in the sense that they both gain the support of followers, and are effective methods of leadership.
The difference between the two styles is the driving force, while charismatic leadership is built around the leader, transformational leadership is around an idea, and it usually involves the input of the other members of the team, not just the leader.
<u>Answer:</u>
- <em>Powers of Congress
</em>
- <em>Power to Tax and Spend</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Congress additionally has the <em>ability to set up post workplaces and post streets, issue licenses and copyrights, fix benchmarks of loads and measures, build up courts mediocre compared to the Supreme Court. </em>
And To make all laws which will be important and appropriate for conveying into execution the prior forces, and every single other influence.
These incorporate the ability to pronounce war, <em>coin cash, raise a military and naval force, manage trade,</em> set up rules of movement and naturalization, and set up the government courts and their wards.
As is regularly acknowledged, the German Reich and Imperial Japan were partners in WW2. Perhaps of course, these two nations had set out on comparable aspirations at the eve of WW2, and their most essential objectives were to drastically grow their range of authority, expand national fringes by acquiring belonging from different nations and to grasp critical assets (oil, key metal minerals, and land zones). The two nations built up a savage nationalistic and racial code of authority. It pursued that their foes were named as of mediocre quality, and in wartime moves, this normally conveyed with it scorn and cruel treatment of adversaries. The Geneva code of fighting was principally disregarded by the two nations. The characterizing component of remorselessness was on account of Nazi Germany, a massive groundbreaking strategy for the destruction of the Jews. Which was additionally actualized on a gram scale. This seems to have no genuine association with the German war exertion. Likewise, moves made by Imperial Japan against the Chinese, bears a similar characteristic of mercilessness, if not in level or arranged execution (or intentions) likewise with the German mistreatment of the Jews. In any case, mercilessness on a relatively extraordinary scale was utilized against what was viewed as the racially second rate, detainees of war and possessed countries.
Certain hypotheses have been made about the yearnings by Nazi Germany to accomplish worldwide authority. A few signs to this impact seem to exist: a task to fabricate a nuclear bomb, a super-sized aircraft, and a substantial submarine was in arranging. Japan may have been more inspired by provincial extension, and accomplishing a heavier job in the Pacific, than real world predominance. Anyway, despite the fact that they had no plans for an atomic limit, the Japanese likewise grown huge weapons like war vessels and plane carrying warships. At last, unique behemoth weaponry came to be definitive for neither the Germans nor the Japanese, in time before the war was finished. An extremist style military principle was set up in the two nations. Germany was directed to vanquish by Adolf Hitler ( who was a Corporal) and Japan by Admiral Tojo. The populace was in the two nations pressured into battling a harsh battle as far as possible, against overpowering chances. As the Nazi despot submitted suicide, the country accepted the open door for ceding. The Japanese be that as it may, declined to surrender in spite of the Hiroshima atomic bomb, and the capitulation was eventually accomplished simply after Nagasaki was devastated in a similar way. The huge contrast here was that Tojo was overruled by the Emperor, who at last finished the war.
Answer: The correct answer is : Attacking the Motive
Explanation: The fallacy of attacking the motive happens when a person argues that the position of another person is invalid. In other words, the second argumentator attacks the first arguer's thesis and does so in a defiant way in his motives behind his argument, such as what benefits from his proposed thesis.
