All categories

3 years ago

How might an economist gather empirical data to test the proposed relationship between money and the price level?

2 answers:

6 0

The quantity theory of money says that:
M V = P Y
where M is money supply, V is income velocity of money, P is price level and Y is income level.
Using the analyze of the empirical data, we can say that there is a long-run association between money and price.

Vikentia [17]3 years ago

6 0

An economist gather empirical data to test the proposed relationship between money and the price level by gathering data on past changes in the money supply and note the resulting changes in the price level.

<h3>Further explanation </h3>

Economists cannot study complex relationships using data because they are unlike the researchers in the hard sciences that can run a controlled laboratory experiment for the generation of data to test the theories and relevant models. An economist would look for data on past changes in the money supply, and note the resulting changes in the price level

An economist can develop models and theories to provide a description of the world based on observed phenomena, because there is a close association between price and money.

Economists do not usually develop theoretical models of the economy but they only analyze the summary statistics about the current state of the economy. An economist would persuade the Federal Reserve to change the money supply to various levels, and also observe the resulting changes in the price level.

An economist supposed to believe that the price level in the economy is directly related to the money supply or the amount of money circulating in the economy. The following relationship is applied to that condition:

$P=A * M$ , where

P = Price Level

M = Money Supply

A = A composite of other factors including real GDP that change very slowly over time.

<h3 /><h3>Learn more</h3>

Learn more about relationship between money and the price level brainly.com/question/6696702

<h3>Answer details</h3>

Grade: 9

Subject: business

Chapter: relationship between money and the price level

Keywords: price level, money

You might be interested in

Your division is considering two projects with the following cash flows (in millions):

eimsori [14]

Answer:

Explanation:

1.If WACC = 5%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.952 $14.28

2 $13 0.907 $11.791

3 $3 0.864 $2.592

__________

NPV = - $ 0.337 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.952 $7.616

2 $3 0.907 $2.721

3 $6 0.864 $5.184

__________

NPV = - $ 0.479 millions

2. If WACC = 10 %

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.909 $13.635

2 $13 0.826 $10.738

3 $3 0.751 $2.253

__________

NPV = - $ 2.374 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.909 $7.272

2 $3 0.826 $2.478

3 $6 0.751 $4.506

__________

NPV = - $ 1.744 millions

3. If WACC = 15%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

4. If WACC = 5% , IRR = ?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% PV factor @ 4% (a)* (b) (a) *(c)

(b) (c)

0 -$29 1 1 - $29 -$29

1 $15 0.952 0.962 $14.28 $14.43

2 $13 0.907 0.925 $11.791 $12.025

3 $3 0.864 0.889 $2.592 $2.667

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 0.337 m NPV = -$0.122 m

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 4% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 4%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% PV factor @ 3% (a)* (b) (a) * (c)

(b) (c)

0 -$16 1 1 - $16 -$16

1 $8 0.952 0.971 $7.616 $7.768

2 $3 0.907 0.943 $2.721 $2.829

3 $6 0.864 0.915 $5.184 $5.49

__________ ____________

NPV = -$ 0.479 m NPV= - $ .087

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 3% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 3%

5. If WACC = 10% , IRR = ?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% PV factor @ 8% (a)* (b) (a) *(c)

(b) (c)

0 -$29 1 1 - $29 -$29

1 $15 0.909 0.926 $13.635 $13.89

2 $13 0.826 0.857 $10.738 $11.141

3 $3 0.751 0.792 $2.253 $2.376

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 2.374 m NPV = -$1.593 m

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% PV factor @ 8% (a)* (b) (a) * (c)

(b) (c)

0 -$16 1 1 - $16 -$16

1 $8 0.909 0.926 $ 7.272 $7.408

2 $3 0.826 0.857 $ 2.478 $2.571

3 $6 0.751 0.792 $ 4.506 $4.752

__________ ____________

NPV = - $ 1.744 m NPV= - $1.269

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

6. If WACC = 15% , IRR =?

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

NPV @ 8% = -$ 1.593

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

NPV @ 8% = -$1.269

Since NPV is fairly close to zero at 8% value of r, therefore IRR ≈ 8%

7.If WACC = 5%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.952 $14.28

2 $13 0.907 $11.791

3 $3 0.864 $2.592

__________

NPV = - $ 0.337 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @5% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.952 $7.616

2 $3 0.907 $2.721

3 $6 0.864 $5.184

__________

NPV = - $ 0.479 millions

NPV of project B > project A than choose Project B

2. If WACC = 10 %

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.909 $13.635

2 $13 0.826 $10.738

3 $3 0.751 $2.253

__________

NPV = - $ 2.374 millions

Project B

Year Cash Flow PV factor @10% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.909 $7.272

2 $3 0.826 $2.478

3 $6 0.751 $4.506

__________

NPV = - $ 1.744 millions

NPV of project A > project B than choose Project A

3. If WACC = 15%

Project A

Year Cash Flow PV factor @ 15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$29 1 - $29

1 $15 0.870 $13.05

2 $13 0.756 $9.828

3 $3 0.658 $1.974

__________

NPV = -$ 4.148 millions

Project BYear Cash Flow PV factor @15% (a)* (b)

(b)

0 -$16 1 - $16

1 $8 0.870 $6.96

2 $3 0.756 $2.268

3 $6 0.658 $3.948

__________

NPV = -$ 2.824 millions

NPV of project A > project B than choose Project A

8 0

4 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Total liabilities - Total assets represents which type of financial ratio?

Readme [11.4K]

I believe the answer is A: Current ratio. It’s the only one that makes sense.

6 0

3 years ago

If a company mistakenly counts more items during a physical inventory than actually exist, how will the error affect its bottom

german

If a company mistakenly counts more items during a physical inventory than actually exist, how will the error affect its bottom line <u>d.Net income will be overstated.</u>

<u />

Explanation:

The Formula for net income is total expense subtracted by total revenues.<u>The total expense can be further sub categorized into cost of goods sold, operating expenses, interest, and taxes.</u>

<u />

To calculate the net income, the cost of goods sold is subtracted from the revenue. In case the cost of goods sold is very low compared to what it actually should be , it makes the net income appear larger than it actually is. it results in an increases in the tax liability for the company.

hence we can say that ,If a company mistakenly counts more items during a physical inventory than actually exist, how will the error affect its bottom line <u>d.Net income will be overstated.</u>

<u />

5 0

3 years ago

When both supply and demand shift to the left, the equilibrium Group of answer choices quantity is indeterminate. price always f

BabaBlast [244]

Answer:

quantity always falls

Explanation:

In the case when the supply and the demand shifted to the left so the equilibrium would price would not be determined also the equilibrium quantity would decline or fall

So according to the given situation, the third option is correct as it shows the quantity fall situation i.e. considered and relevant too

5 0

3 years ago

What is a living will?

yarga [219]

A Living Will is a legal document in which a person specifies what actions should be taken for their health if they are no longer able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity.

5 0

3 years ago