Answer:
<u>a defense attorney instead</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
From a financial standpoint, a <u>defense attorney</u> would more likely make more money than a<u> juvenile prosecutor</u> because a defense attorney could charge up more for certain cases than been a juvenile prosecutor who wants to ensure someone is convicted.
Also, in terms of purpose, I do feel a defense lawyer could make more impact socially by defending his or her clients.
Answer: none of the above.
Explanation:
The Engle curve shows the relationship that takes place between the income of a consumer and the quantity of a particular good purchased.
From the question we are informed that the income consumption curve between good x and good y has a negative slope, this implies that good Y is an inferior good and that it has a negative income elasticity.
Also, since the Engle curve of good X has a positive slope, it implies that good X is a normal good.
Therefore, the answer to the question is "none of the above" as all options are true.
Sorry you never got an answer and are only getting one after 2 years :(
But for everyone in the future who wants to use this for help the answer is Stocks!
Answer:
The expected return that IMI can provide subject to Johnson's risk constraint is 8.5%
Explanation:
Capital Market Line (CML)
Expected return on the market portfolio, E(
) = 12 %
Standard deviation on the market portfolio, σ
= 20%
Risk-free rate, 
= 5%
E(
) = + [ E(
) - ] × ( σ
÷ σ)
= 0.05 + [ 0.12 - 0.05] × (0.10 ÷ 0.20)
= 8.5%
