Answer:
The rule which states that if a verb is in past tense, then its subject should be in past tense too and if it's in present tense, the subject should also be in present tense.
“I was amazed at his equanimity in the face of danger.”
The verb "was" is in past tense so is the subject "amazed".
Explanation:
A simple subject-verb agreement definition says that the subject of the sentence and the verb of the sentence must be in agreement in number/tense.
If the sentence is written like this
“I am amaze at his equanimity in the face of danger.”
If the verb "was" is replaced by "am" and the subject "amazed" is replaced by "amaze", the sentence would become incorrect as it disregards the subject verb agreement.
Answer:
c. They are very close, in spite of their differences.
Explanation:
I know this questions is from the passage about "Gurdun and Ursula" right?
If it is, the answer is C. This is because in the passage, the difference in the personalities of these two girls is shown obviously. So that, the answer B and D is wrong. In addition, there is nothing in the passage indicating if Gurdun and Ursula share the same room or not.
Co-mate is defined as companion. In this passage, the close relationship and trust, and tenderness to each other of these two girls indicate that they accompany each other in their lives.
From the line : By that time will my aged years perhaps a staff require,
the effect of envisioning "aged years" would be : it reveal how weary the speaker is of waiting to see what effect she might have had on others/
Hope this helps
"Pap always said it warn't no harm to barrow things if you was meaning to pay them back sometime; but the widow said it warn't anything but a soft name for stealing and no decent body would do it"
(i think haha)
As we entered the ski resort, we saw a variety of slopes to choose from!
I didn't see the steep slopes that ran for miles because I had been asleep.
Those were the only two I could really think up of. Hope they were of use!
