How was the North able to replenish its military in the face of staggering loses on the battlefield?

2 answers:

8 0

One of the ways in which the North was able to replenish its military in the face of staggering loses on the battlefield was that "It inflicted even heavier loses on the Confederacy," since the Union's army was much larger.

irina [24]4 years ago

8 0

The correct answer is B. The North stablished a wartime draft that helped to bend the Confederate forces, through the numerical supremacy of their forces.

After the attack of Fort Sumter, President Lincoln recruited a volunteer army in each state.

Even though most of the federal properties on Confederate soil had changed hands peacefully, there were still a number of resisting forts, especially Fort Sumter, and Lincoln was determined to keep it that way. On April 12, General Pierre Gustave de Beauregard, following the orders of President Davis, began a cannon fire against the fort, which, lacking any help, had to surrender, as well as the others. Lincoln, then, ordered the states to recruit volunteers to form troops to recover the lost forts and maintain the Union. As the rebellion so far seemed small, the request would be limited to 75,000 men for 90 days. Many states had already been doing it for several months, so they could start moving their militias the day after the presidential order.

You might be interested in

Plez help will give brainliest plz give explanation

Amanda [17]

Answer:

D or 4th answer

Or B or 2nd answer

Explanation:

Its kinda blurry but what I can make out is something about laws so either cheif executive or supreme court

5 0

3 years ago

President Herbert Hoover did not want the government to create as many new jobs as the millions of unemployed people needed beca

Butoxors [25]

It would require the federal government to provide jobs and he did not want people getting used to that

7 0

3 years ago

5. About what percentage of the Indian population lives in the lower and middle Ganges river basin?

sladkih [1.3K]

The Ganges is a trans-boundary river of Asia which flows through the nations of India and Bangladesh, roughly "40%" of the Indian population that lives in the lower and middle Ganges river basin, although this figure changes slightly depending on the exact time in question.

6 0

4 years ago

Which of these BEST describes the significance of the Emancipation Proclamation?

lina2011 [118]

C. The President publicly announced slavery would end in southern states. The Emancipation Proclamation was a war measure issued by Abraham Lincoln that freed slaves in Confederate-held lands (excluding non-rebelling states and a few others), with said freedom issuing through advance of union troops or with the slaves running away from captivity.

The measure was created after the mediocre victory of Antietam, with the purpose of changing the reason of the war, from that of preserving the Union to a moral one, of battling slavery. This was crucial for the public and political perception of Lincoln's government (the Union public at least), at the same time helping winning them the war in the front, since roughly 200.000 ex-slave escapees entered the ranks of the Union army.

3 0

3 years ago

What does the declaration say about law and fairness

devlian [24]

One of the first principles articulated in the Declaration of Independence is that of equality. The Declaration asserts that “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal.” The rule of equality is tied to the creation of mankind by God. This proposition is not the incantation of a religious establishment. It is a legal fact acknowledged to be “self-evident.” The Declaration is a legal instrument. It is intended for a legal object. It speaks of equality in a legal sense. The Declaration asserts that mankind is created and that as far as the law is concerned, mankind is created equally human by God.9

There are at least two consequences of this proposition. The first is that all human beings are endowed with the right to enjoy equal legal rights, legal opportunity and legal protection.10 The second consequence of the rule of legal equality is that it neither mandates nor permits the civil government to ensure equal social position, economic well-being or political power. The Declaration’s recognition that “all men are created equal” does not mean that the civil government must treat each person the same on the basis of what they do or on the basis of their conduct. Social and economic achievement is a function of behavior or conduct. It is a function of individual labor and enterprise. Political power is a function of political involvement and knowledge of the political system. As long as the law guarantees the right of an individual to participate on an equal basis with other individuals in achieving the desired social position, economic condition or political strength, then differences in outcome or result do not contravene the rule of legal equality.

In essence, the rule of legal equality requires that the law be no respecter of persons. A law is a respecter of persons if it treats persons differently because of their immutable status or belief. The law is not a respecter of persons, however, if it treats persons differently on the basis of their acts or conduct.11 The law looks to what a person does, not who they are. Those who deny the rule of equality or its origins in the law of God, or who argue that equality is subject to changing cultural or social conditions, or who twist the meaning of equality to require government mandated quotas, do so in contravention of the principle of equality.

President Abraham Lincoln, referring to the Declaration of Independence, affirmed that the United States was “conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that ‘all men are created equal’.”12 Lincoln realized that the rule of equality applied to all men and nations without regard to the age in which they lived, their location on the globe, or the circumstances of history which surrounded them. He spoke of this rule in a speech at Springfield in 1857. He said that through the Declaration, the framers,

meant to set up a standard maxim for free society, which should be familiar to all, and revered by all; constantly looked to, constantly labored for, and even though never perfectly attained, constantly approximated, and thereby constantly spreading and deepening its influence and augmenting the happiness and value of life to all people of all colors everywhere.13

Unfortunately, in many contexts including religious liberty litigation (as will be explored shortly) the principle of equality has been constantly ignored and labored against. The notion of rights conditioned upon status and religious belief has been much more preferred. It is quite common, therefore, that contrary to the rule of equality, litigants seek to diminish the rights of others because of the other’s belief, or expand their own rights because of their own beliefs.

4 0

4 years ago