Answer:
Authoritarian rule can be or cannot be legitimate because existence of pure legitimacy is not possible
Explanation:
The legitimacy represents outspoken public loyalty and conformist mentality of a individual /group/organization which shapes the repressive administrative machinery to be of a high developed nature. This is not possible in authoritarian regimes which leverage to facilitate certain sects of the society like elite group.
However, in current time pure legitimacy is also not possible hence the concept of authoritative legitimacy is arising.
Answer:
Native Americans
Explanation:
In 1754, Britain and France went to war over lands in the Ohio River Valley. This was called the French and Indian War. Colonists supported Britain, while the NATIVE AMERICANS allied themselves with the French.
This is evident from the common name given to the war which is "French and Indian War" (sometimes it is called Seven Years war because it officially lasted for seven years between 1756 to 1763)
Also, there is evidence from the fact that during this period, it is only French colonists that have better relations with the Native Americans compared to other European settlers in America.
Answer:
When someone answers Brainliest answer comes below you tap it and it will come lol
<span>the arguments of Richard Hakluyt
</span>
Generally speaking, yes, free market economies are meant to exist without governmental control, although in the "real world" there is almost always some amount of government oversight and control.
