A good conclusion in a research paper restates the hypothesis so that reader can see the value of argument which either defends or criticizes the hypothesis. If it's a long paper it's a good idea to restate the hypothesis in the conclusion. This reminds the user of the hypothesis and draws the paper together. It also revisits the hypothesis and can provide new insight into the hypothesis. Another reason for restating the hypothesis in the conclusion is to pose questions and open the door for future research.
I think the correct answer is a
Answer:
Fluoride theoretically should have 8
Explanation:
Fluoride is the Fluorine ion, meaning electrons are added or substracted from Fluorine to form Fluoride. Usually, an ion has a full outer shell.
The first option for 1 and the second option for 2
Answer:
its tongue and camouflage
Explanation:
