Answer: Because each state was looking out for its personal interests in regard to representation in Congress.
Details:
The Great Compromise and the Three-Fifths Compromise both focused on the representation of states in Congress. Both of these compromises were devised during the United States Constitutional Convention in 1787.
- The Great Compromise resolved a dispute between small population states and large population states. The large population states wanted representation in Congress to be based on a state's population size. The smaller states feared this would lead to unchecked dominance by the big states; they wanted all states to receive the same amount of representation. The Great Compromise created a bicameral (two-chamber) legislature. Representation in the House of Representatives would be based on population. In the Senate, all states would have the same amount of representation, by two Senators.
- The Three-Fifths Compromise was a way of accounting (somewhat) for the population of slaves in states that permitted slavery. For taxation and representation purposes, the question was whether slaves should count in the population figures. (They were not considered voting citizens at that time.) The Three-Fifths Compromise said that three out of every five slaves could be counted when determining a state's population size for determining how many seats that state would receive in the House of Representatives.
The United States was alarmed by Soviet control of Eastern Europe at the end WW II because officials believed Soviet expansion would not stop at Eastern Europe.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The Grand Alliance, otherwise called The Big Three, was a military union comprising of the three significant Allies of World War II: the Soviet Union, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Relations between the Soviet Union and the United States were driven by a perplexing exchange of ideological, political, and monetary elements, which prompted moves between wary collaboration and frequently severe superpower contention throughout the years.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I think the Candy Bomber reflects the story of the Berlin Airlift in that it shows the humanitarian side of the military, in this case, American Colonel Gail Halvorsen, who was a command pilot for the US Airforce that participated in the Berlin Airlift, after Soviet leader Joseph Stalin had ordered to close any land entries to West Berlin.
Colonel Halvorsen used to drop candy as a gift to German kids. So people started to call him "Candy Bomber."
The United States, France, and British Airforce sent airplanes full of food and supplies to West Berlin. This helped people survive for almost a year.
