Answer:
It is observed that the value of test statistics (19.168) is greater than the critical value (13.277), thus the rejected hypothesis, H₀ at α = 0.01.
There is enough evidence to conclude or deduce that sales were the same for all locations
Explanation:
Solution
Given that:
Object: Test whether the sales were the same for all locations by applying 1% significance level.
The Null Hypothesis H₀ : Sales were the same for all locations
E₁ = 70 +75 +70+ 50 + 35/5 = 60
The Alternative Hypothesis Hₐ : Sales were not the same for all locations
Now,
The decision rule:
the Level of Significance be α = 0.01
Degrees of freedom is df= Number of categories -1
=5-1 = 4
Note: Kindly find an attached copy of part of the work solution of this given question
A franchise can be used.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Franchise refers to the authorization that is given by the government for involving in commercial activities. It is the permission that is obtained legally for using the ideas, expertise and processes of some one else with their permissions.
In the example given, a firm is willing to provide all necessary materials for the preparation of coffee and wants to penetrate the European market. The company here provides all the equipment, ingredients, trademarks and operating systems and hence it can make use of franchise type of strategy.
The type of supply-chain strategy uses by Hope Spring to fills orders as they come in from inventory is called the pull supply-chain strategy.
The pull supply strategy is a manufacturing strategy that is influenced by consumer's demand because the demand are used to decide the level of procurement, production and distribution of product.
This strategy is very effective to prevent against wastage or over-production since the level of demand for the product determine the level of producing such product.
Therefore, in conclusion, the example of this is known as Pull supply-chain strategy.
Learn more about this here
<em>brainly.com/question/17830486</em>
Answer:
40%
Explanation:
The computation of the return on equity is shown below:
= (Net income - interest expense) ÷ (weightage average of common stockholders' equity)
where,
Weightage average of common stockholders' equity equals to
= (Total common stockholders' equity at the beginning of the year + Total common stockholders' equity at the end of the year) ÷ 2
= ($410,000 + $290,000) ÷ 2
= $350,000
And, the other items values would remain the same
Now put these values to the above formula
So, the value would be equal to
= ($170,000 - $30,000) ÷ ($350,000)
= 40%
Answer:
-20.27%
Explanation:
Value = ($14,750 / $18,500) - 1 = -20.27%
