Answer:
The Hi-Stakes Company
a. If the direct exchange rate increases, the dollar strengthens relative to the other currency.
b. If the indirect exchange rate increases, the dollar also strengthens relative to the other currency.
Explanation:
When the exchange rate increases, it means that more of the other currency is required in order to embark on importing and exporting transactions. However, the increases will weaken the ability of the importing currency to afford the dollar-based goods, which have then being made more expensive.
Answer:
Unstructured interview
Explanation:
Unstructured interview is defined as one in which the questions asked are not prearranged. Rather they are spontaneous and questions to be asked are formulated during the course of the interview.
On the other structured interview is when questions are prearranged and candidates are asked the same questions.
So when Matt and Claire go into an interview for the same position and they get asked very different questions depending on how the interview is going, they are answering unstructured interview questions.
This is tough to answer in 3-5 sentences, and tends to also be a heavy identifier of your possible political leanings. You'll have to apologize if some of mine leak out in the response, but this is a question we debate hotly more frequently than every 4 years.
In general, international trade can help increase the GDP and overall profits for US-based corporations. However, if all we do is export, and we don't import, other countries don't look favorably upon that and may heavily tax our goods to counter this.
I believe we do need to be thoughtful about the amounts and kinds of international trade that we engage in. For example, farming is always a hotly debated issue for international trade, in part because farmers in other countries with a dramatically lower cost of living OR farmers in countries with a favorable currency rate (exchange from their currency to our dollars gives them an advantage) can undercut our farmers here in the US, many of whom are already struggling.
There are also those who are worried that when we import produce from countries that have not outlawed pesticides we know are carcinogenic, for instance, this creates not only a disadvantage for US farmers, but also for consumers who may be concerned about health issues.
As another example of this, many countries outlawed import of US beef during the Mad Cow Epidemic. We in turn also placed bans on importing beef from the UK.
These are examples of why it's important to be thoughtful about trade, but there are certainly many others, including decline in production jobs within the US that have left cities like Detroit a ghost town (this was formerly the hub of our automotive industry production).
Answer:
Key Points
Explanation:
The government may artificially increase prices through purchasing a portion of the consumer surplus or artificially increase quantity through offering subsidies to producers. This allows the government control over the established equilibrium in agriculture.
Answer:
The answer is A. Debit: Land, $1,200,000
Explanation:
The journal entry Lattern Company needs to record is:
Dr Land 1,200,000
Cr Common share 12,000
Cr Paid-in capital - Common share 1,188,000
As 120,000 shares is exchanged for the land and the share is traded in the exchange, the value of the land should be recorded at the market price of these 120,000 shares or 120,000 x 10 = $1,200,000.
Common share account is recorded at par value x number of shares issued = 0.1 x 120,000 = $12,000 while Paid-in capital-Common share account records the difference between market price and par value at the time of shares issuance or ( 10 - 0.1) x 120,000 = $1,188,000.
Thus, the correct answer is A. Debit: Land, $1,200,000
