Answer:
The Answer is D: Nominal group technique
Explanation:
From the question, it is clear that the CEO of Mi Ola is encouraging everyone to bring up that idea they have in mind. She is encouraging everyone to make a decision as it is never wrong as long as you're moving. Bounded rationality talks about making rational decisions that will most likely satisfy personal needs. This does not seem to be the kind of statement made here. The statement is like a booster to everyone to come up with ideas, which bring us to the concept of nominal group technique. This technique encourages contributions from an entire team and encourages swift agreement on the relative significance of problems, issues, and solutions.
Answer:
since the price elasticity of demand for students is -4, the the price charged to them should be:
price = [-4 / (-4 + 1)] x $6 = (-4 / -3) x $6 = $8
since the price elasticity of demand for faculty is -2, the the price charged to them should be:
price = [-2 / (-2 + 1)] x $6 = (-2 / -1) x $6 = $12
Answer:
D) AIG
Explanation:
We went back in time to 2008 and we are in the middle of the subprime mortgage crisis. This is an example of how mortgage backed securities and collateralized debt obligations worked.
The problem with this scenario is that in order for every company involved to be able to make a profit, the mortgages' interest rates skyrocketed which made it harder for families to pay back their loans. This eventually made the families lose their houses and that was the end to the housing bubble and the whole economy collapsed.
Answer:
c. $9,000
Explanation:
a. Adjusted basis in the passive activity: $0
b. Rhonda is facing a net loss of $12,000 from passive operation.
Since it uses $7,500 of the loss to. the total at risk to $0.
c. This year passive loss suspended $7,500
The loss suspended in the prior year is $1,500
So, Therefore, the suspended passive loss passed over to the following years total $9,000
Now, Suspended passive loss $9,000 ($7,500 suspended loss in current year + $1,500 suspended loss in the previous year)
Answer: 0.78 pound mark exchange rate
Explanation:
The Purchasing power parity (PPP) is typically used to make comparison between the currencies of different countries' currencies and also used in comparing their standards of living.
According to PPP, the pound-mark exchange rate in 2003 will be calculated as:
= 280/360
= 0.78
