1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rudiy27
3 years ago
5

How did indians respond to the news of the amritsar massacre?

History
1 answer:
Lady bird [3.3K]3 years ago
3 0

  The Amritsar massacre was a slaughter taken by soldiers of the indian-british army in the city of Amritsar on April 13<u>th</u>  1919. This soldiers in command of the general Reginald Dyer shoot with machine guns to a crowd of thousands of people of differents creeds unarmed who were celebrating the Vaisakhi (Indian new year). The result of this attack let 329 cassualties and 1200 wounded people.

  The reactions in the rest of India were specially condemnatory so much for the act itself as for the saids of the general Dyer who told in his report that the people in Amritsar were a potential rebel army and his intention was to punish the disobedience. In Britain the goverment of Lloyd George tried to avoid the spread of the news considering it as a scandal and several politics like Winston Churchill stood agains it while more details were leak like the one that the indian people were unarmed at the time the shoot started.

  Nevertheless this actions, a big part of the british government in India approved Dyer´s actions asking not to punsih him if not congratulates him for stopping a possible revolution in the region.

  But the most important consequence of this massacre took by the british was that it marks the prelude of the non coperation movement held by Mahatma Ghandi between 1920 and 1922.

You might be interested in
How was the Continental Navy able to hold its own against Britain's Royal Navy?
Monica [59]

Answer:

The American Revolutionary War saw a series battles involving naval forces of the British Royal Navy and the Continental Navy from 1775, and of the French Navy from 1778 onwards. While the British enjoyed more numerical victories these battles culminated in the surrender of the British Army force of Lieutenant-General Earl Charles Cornwallis, an event that led directly to the beginning of serious peace negotiations and the eventual end of the war. From the start of the hostilities, the British North American station under Vice-Admiral Samuel Graves blockaded the major colonial ports and carried raids against patriot communities. Colonial forces could do little to stop these developments due to British naval supremacy. In 1777, colonial privateers made raids into British waters capturing merchant ships, which they took into French and Spanish ports, although both were officially neutral. Seeking to challenge Britain, France signed two treaties with America in February 1778, but stopped short of declaring war on Britain. The risk of a French invasion forced the British to concentrate its forces in the English Channel, leaving its forces in North America vulnerable to attacks.

8 0
3 years ago
Hat was the result of the Supreme Court ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden?
diamong [38]
The main result of the Supreme Court ruling in Gibbons v. Ogden was that "<span>The Court defined interstate commerce and declared federal law supreme over state law," since the ruling was that the power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce applied to navigation as well. </span>
3 0
2 years ago
What is Mayan (Central America)? I need four google slides. What am I supposed to talk about?
Zepler [3.9K]

Answer:

You could talk about it's past and/or it's ancient civilizations. You could also possibly compare it's old civilization to it's current one, talk about the changes.

5 0
3 years ago
Which describes the British advantages over the Americans at the beginning of the war?
MissTica
D. The British had a navy, professional army, a blockade, and mercenaries
7 0
2 years ago
What made the Glamour of American cities?
kipiarov [429]
They spread like wildfire. For a new factory to beat the competition, it had to be built quickly. Laborers needed fast, cheap housing located close to work. Roads would be hastily built to connect the factory with the market. There was no grand design, and consequently, the new American city spread unpredictably. Urban sprawl had begun. But the growing beast brought benefits that raised the standard of living to new heights. The modern American city was truly born in the Gilded Age. The bright lights, tall buildings, material goods, and fast pace of urban life emerged as America moved into the 20th century. However, the marvelous horizon of urban opportunity was not accessible to all. Beneath the glamour and glitz lay social problems previously unseen in the United States.
7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • "Act only upon that maxim that you can will at the same time will to be a universal maxim" is the _________ formulation of the c
    7·1 answer
  • How important is it for Congress to have the power to impeach the president?
    6·2 answers
  • What is pan americanism
    14·1 answer
  • Why did most merchants not travel the entire distance from china to the middle east to trade their goods?
    15·2 answers
  • What event and industry initiated the labor union movement in the United States? A. The civil war and importing B. The industria
    6·1 answer
  • Which reason best explains the movement of Georgias capitals as shown on the map
    14·1 answer
  • What topic did Abigail Adams write about to her husband, John Adams
    7·1 answer
  • What physical features impacted early civilization in Mesoamerica?
    8·1 answer
  • Taxes refunded the construction of major roads in Oklahomas early years. The state constructed six major highways that ran (A. N
    11·1 answer
  • Which word best summarizes Dr. King's feelings about the future?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!