Topic: Decision on traveling to Mars
Source 1: Alexander Fisher
Evidence 1: "Mars is the most likely planet for us to colonize"
Evidence 2: "The technology we would need to develop to send humans to Mars would directly benefit our economy here on Earth."
Evidence 3: "Studies have shown that radiation levels on Mars are not lethal to humans. Sure, we would have to live in a dome at first, but over time, we could use science to change the atmosphere and make it possible to go outside, just like on Earth!"
Source 2: Juniper Springs
Evidence 1: "...it is too dangerous. The atmosphere of the planet is more carbon dioxide than oxygen, and it’s very cold.
Evidence 2: "Also, going to Mars would be very expensive."
Evidence 3: "that does not mean they aren't dangerous." "It is foolish to think a dome would be able to protect us from all of the radiation."
what
no like really, if you clarify i might be able to help a little here
Answer:
The "fire and brimstone" style is often referred to as a method of preaching that is used by Christian preachers to paint clear images of hell and eternal doom to all people that are living in sin to change their ways and turn to God so he can forgive them.
This style was made popular by Jonathan Edwards when he preached a sermon titled, "Sinners in the hands of an angry God" during the Great Awakening in the United States.
Answer:
Fallacy is the use of invalid or otherwise faulty reasoning, or "wrong moves" in the construction of an argument. Faulty reasoning occurs when the conclusion is not supported by the data.
"What to the slave is the Fourth of July?" is faulty reasoning because it's incorrect thinking, and not based on correct conclusions and isn't supported by data or facts.
