Upper class individuals are more likely to work in safer environments, such as an office is not an explanation for the given statement.
Answer: Option C
<u>Explanation:</u>
In the given statement the discussion involves life expectancy with respect to education, occupation and income and explain its meaning that upper class live longer and healthier lives than those in lower class.
But the statement that upper class individuals are more likely to work in safer environments, such as an office do not categorize statement according to lower or upper class, that safer environment for work can be available among educated, occupated and handsome income constituted society only, because many brutal cases are examples of unsafe working atmosphere too and even in well structured office.
Education, Occupation and Income are sources of happiness but decision to stay happy and sensible for either rich or poor basically generate from within’s intellectual learning and not biased with any race.
The largest part of government spending is fixed and cannot be easily reduced was the reason behind the difficulty for the federal government to make large cuts in spending.
<h3><u>Explanation: </u></h3>
The US budget allocation is divided into different categories and more than half is for mandatory spending which the government cannot alter easily. Examples include social security and medical care, and to show the spending example in 2017 Financial year, Medical care spent 27% of spending costs and Social security spent 24% while other departments and agencies spent a maximum of 15%.
Payment for mandatory expenditures should meet criteria specified by the law while discretionary payments are renewed annually as part of the budget and planning process.
The Caribbean............
