Littering there is so much I saw a cat in a old ups box and I wanted to cry its just so much trash
Here is the paragraph you should be looking at for your answers
Answer:
E). Injustice is so much better than justice that only a fool would choose to be just.
Explanation:
The key idea that Galucon emphasizes is that 'justice itself is not a good idea' and calls it 'self-interested.' He finds the very human nature to be unjust and self-seeking. The humans perpetuates justice only for their consequential good. He rather suggests that perfect unjustness is more pleasant, rational, and better than justice and argues that no individual pursues justice willingly. <u><em>The argument he puts on is that 'if people are given an opportunity to be unjust without any ache, they would propagate it rationally.</em></u>' Thus, <u>option E</u> is the correct answer.
The concept that Marsiglia and Kulis are referring to from the statement mentioned in the question is a term called intersectionality.
Intersectionality is a concept that is generally defined as <em>a framework that acknowledges how an individual is impacted by various systems of power – and his or her position in each system, when combined would create a different experience in how an individual would be treated by the society at large. </em>
For example, an individual who identifies as Black, is female, has an upper middle class income, is heterosexual would navigate life differently from someone who is White, male, has a lower class income, and is homosexual.