Answer:
financial planning
Explanation:
It is best to be prepared. most things we want to do cost money. It is very easy to loose track of spending money.
Answer:
Equivalent units
Materials 10,200
Covnersion Cost 9, 100
Explanation:
![\left[\begin{array}{cccc}&$Physical Units&$Materials&$Conversion\\$Beginning&2,000&0.6&0.4\\$Transferred out&9,000&&\\$Ending&3,000&0.8&0.3\\$Equivalent Units&&10,200&9,100\\\end{array}\right]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cleft%5B%5Cbegin%7Barray%7D%7Bcccc%7D%26%24Physical%20Units%26%24Materials%26%24Conversion%5C%5C%24Beginning%262%2C000%260.6%260.4%5C%5C%24Transferred%20out%269%2C000%26%26%5C%5C%24Ending%263%2C000%260.8%260.3%5C%5C%24Equivalent%20Units%26%2610%2C200%269%2C100%5C%5C%5Cend%7Barray%7D%5Cright%5D)
The equivalent units will be calcualte as follow:
transferred out
ending x completion
<u> (beginning x completion) </u>
Equivalent units
<u>Materials</u>
9,000 + 3,000 x 80% - 2,000 x 60% = 10,200
<u>Conversion Cost</u>
9,000 + 3,000 x 30% - 2,000 x 40% = 9,100
Answer:
less expansive
Explanation:
i took the test. i got it right
IBM's Smarter Planet campaign markets IBM as a company that provides innovative solutions that improve the world's IQ. This is an example of organization marketing.
<h3><u>
Explanation:</u></h3>
Marketing function plays a vital role in the success of any company. It is the process by which the companies will first find the potential markets for selling their products and then promote their products saying how they vary from the other similar products.
Organisation marketing is the strategy that is being used by the business but a difference is that here customers will buy their products and do not used those products personally. In the example given, IBM markets innovative solutions that helps in improving the Intelligence Quotient. This acts as an example of organization marketing.
<span>It is associated with using a market penetration strategy when there is an opportunity for price skimming. Leaving money on the table means that during a business deal or negotiation one of the parties does not receive the amount of money they could have earned, instead they accept a smaller sum. This strategy can be beneficial or hurtful depending on the scenario.</span>