Taft reshaped U.S. diplomacy through dollar diplomacy, and Woodrow Wilson used moral diplomacy
It could clean then produce cotton tenfold the time it would take a normal human. It had a negative impact because since it would clean cotton so fast many plantation owners bought more cotton (the more the cotton the more the money). But more cotton requires more harvesters so these plantation owners also would buy more slaves. This of course was not good since this commenced through out the whole country causing a massive spike of slaves to be purchased. If you have any more questions just ask :)
Answer:
France had already experienced revolutions so people knew what to expect and were more accepting of change.
Explanation
<span>D. Two Mongol attacks on Japan failed when storms and typhoons nearly destroyed the Mongol fleets on both occasions. Because of all the options above this is the only one that can justify why they failed in the invasions in Mongol side or perspective. While the other side glorify the victory of the Japanese letter D. gives the reason the Mongol lose because of the typhoon not because of the Japanese.</span>
Alexander the great unified Greek City States, I think. Hope I could help
