D. He looked to the Classical past for truth
While Rousseau did study the past in his pursuit of truth, he looked at man in his natural state (i.e pre-civilization). Rousseau's Discourse on Inequality is his foray into the evolution of man from his natural state into what the man of Rousseau's time. Rousseau described uncivilized man as a "noble savage". Critics argue that Rousseau was idealizing man in an uncivilized state and advocating for a return to this. What he likely meant was that man is naturally moral (driven by the well- balanced instincts of piety and survival) and that it is society that corrupts man. Classical philosophy and art is part of the society that Rousseau criticizes. In his Discourse on the Arts and Sciences he provides the link between the fall of the Roman empire and the peak of the Roman arts as an example of the detrimental effect arts (and that which was celebrated during the classical Greek and Roman periods as the best kind of human activity) has on man's natural sense of decency and morality.
The ancient society that observed monotheism, belief in only one god is option b) Jews.
The Jews have been believing that the supreme power is only one and hence have been practicing monotheism. They have been long since ages followed this tradition along with Islam, Christianity, Judaism etc.
Monotheism is the tradition of believing one god or one power different from that of polytheism. However, it is not the oneness but the uniqueness that counts in monotheism. Many at times it is considered as just numbers, as one god vs many gods or goddess. This it oversimplified and is mistaken often by people.
To know more about monotheism visit:
brainly.com/question/28855446
#SPJ4
Being ethical is to have standards. If you are spontaneous you aren't really expecting anything you're acting purely on impulse. So I guess no.
C. Pyrenees. <span>Reaching a height of 3,404 meters (11,168 ft)</span>
The power of veto was not just restricted to the consuls. All officers of state (consuls, praetors, censors, aediles and quaestors) had the power of veto. Officers of the same rank could veto each other and officers of higher rank could veto officers of lower rank.
