1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
alina1380 [7]
3 years ago
11

Which of the following best explains the federalists view on including the bill of rights in the constitution? A.the constitutio

n already limited Powers of government, so a list of rights was not needed. B. The government would not be able to enforce penalties against these violating rights. C. A bill of rights would threaten the freedom of any people not included on the list period D.a bill of rights would weaken the government to the point that it could not function.
History
1 answer:
nasty-shy [4]3 years ago
6 0

<u>Answer:</u>

<em>A. The constitution already limited Powers of government, so a list of rights was not needed. </em>

<em></em>

<u>Explanation:</u>

The idea behind having a Constitution is that it limits the powers of the government and sets certain law and rules that are to be followed while governing. Hence when there were debates for the "ratification" of the Constitution, the Federalists concluded that the Constitution didn’t require any list of rights, as the Constitution itself limits the powers of the government. Moreover, Bill of Rights was unnecessary as the Constitution was drafted with a strong concept of "Separation of Powers", and the Check and Balance system. Under this the government has been divided into three categories and these three categories check and limit the powers of each other.

You might be interested in
Why did general William T. Sherman have the nickname “Mad Dog”?
mixas84 [53]
Because he was a very mad man I’m guessing
5 0
3 years ago
Joe works at a market. As part of his job, he counts the money left in his cash register and locks it in the store safe.Every ni
Rasek [7]
Joe has committed embezzlement
4 0
2 years ago
Some individual states have abolished slavery in their constitutions.   Confederation delegates Nevin Weinberg and Dani Kwatcher
shusha [124]
They could solve it. According to them, only 1 representative from each state would be in the congress. With 13 states, 9/13 yes votes would be needed to make something a national law. The articles could abolish slavery federation wide if 9 states out of 13 vote to abolish it.
5 0
3 years ago
The president is the head of this branch and he has the power to grant pardons and sign treaties. ​
vichka [17]

Answer:

if this is a true or false question the answer is true

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Help lol , pleaseee uhm
aev [14]

Answer:

its D

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did victor Hugo influence the world
    14·1 answer
  • Who came to America to seek his fortune in the textile industry
    11·1 answer
  • What is purpose of the body paragraph when writing an essay??
    11·2 answers
  • Select the correct answer.
    5·2 answers
  • What side was India on in ww2?
    15·2 answers
  • HELP PLEASE IXL REPEAT IXL MATH HELP HELP
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following countries were the axis powers? united states and great britain germany and japan china and france great
    10·2 answers
  • The purpose of the initiative and the 17th amendment was to? <br><br> i need it now own words please
    5·1 answer
  • Charles Lindbergh was known as a heroic soldier. a popular radio announcer. a popular baseball player. a heroic pilot.
    8·2 answers
  • Take my points, im quitting
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!