Yep they disagreed about wether or not slavery should be legal
Answer:
Option B is your answer (He defeated the forces left behind by Alexander The Great)
Explanation:
because the Maurya empire was ruled by the Maurya dynasty from 322 - 185 BCE, and by 316 BCE they had fully occupied northwestern India and defeated the satraps left by Alexander The Great. Chandragupta Maurya was the Mauryan ruler who defeated Alexanders general Seleucus nicator and received the territories of Kabul and Balochistan in 305 BC. I found this on the lesson of this test, I am 100% sure this is your answer. Hope this helped.
The development of irrigation systems made farming easier, as water was more easily accessible to crops. This meant that food could be produced more efficiently. More efficient farming techniques meant that food was more plentiful, where people weren't constantly scrambling for their next meal or going days without eating. It also gave people the ability to specialize in certain trades, creating better quality of goods and advancing technology in civilizations.
In his text "Slavery, a System of Inherent Cruelty," Theodore D. Weld shows how cattle were sometimes treated better than slaves. An example he gives of this is how cattle are allowed to graze as much as they want, while slaves often received a very small portion of food. Another example he gives is how when cattle are to be sold, they are transported in a way that is comfortable to them. On the other hand, slaves often had to walk very long distances, regardless of the weather, while being chained to each other.
