It seems to me, that if you were to add the price of all three items together, then multiply by 7.5%, you'd have the answer. Remember that 7.5% = .075 ... in other words, that is the number you would multiply the sum of the items by. Does that help?
You can approximate the square root of 30 by taking the square root of a number close to it. This is called local linearization. You can take the square root of 36, which is 6, and the square root of 25, which is 5, and state that the square root of 30 is approximately somewhere between 5 and 6
100 because of complementary angles
Answer:
Since the calculated value of F = 1.4397 is less than the critical value of
F (9,9)= 2.4403 we conclude that the first instructor's variance is smaller and reject H0.
Step-by-step explanation:
1)Formulate the hypothesis that first variance is equal or greater than the second variance
H0: σ₁²≥σ₂² against the claim that the first instructor's variance is smaller
Ha: σ₁²< σ₂²
2) Test Statistic F= s₂²/s₁²
F= 84.8/ 58.9= 1.4397
3)Degrees of Freedom = n1-1= 10-1= 9 and n2 = 10-1= 9
4)Critical value at 10 % significance level= F(9,9)= 2.4403
5)Since the calculated value of F = 1.4397 is less than the critical value of
F (9,9)= 2.4403 we conclude that the first instructor's variance is smaller and reject H0.
Answer:
The equation of the line is y = 2x + 3
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find this, we first need to find the slope. For that we use slope intercept form.
m(slope) = (y2 - y1)/(x2 - x1)
m = (15 - 7)/(6 -2)
m = 8/4
m =2
Now that we have this, we can use the slope and either point in slope-intercept form to get the equation.
y - y1 = m(x - x1)
y - 7 = 2(x - 2)
y - 7 = 2x - 4
y = 2x + 3
