1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
koban [17]
2 years ago
6

Why does Hamilton think judges should be appointed

History
2 answers:
Paul [167]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Periodic appointments would destroy a judge's  independence

Explanation:

Look above, The person explains it in depth

bonufazy [111]2 years ago
7 0

Answer:

O. Periodic appointments would destroy a judge's  independence.

Explanation:

Alexander Hamilton wrote in his "Federalist Papers No. 78" how the independence of judges is important for the security of everyone. Stating that <em>"the general liberty of the people can never be endangered .... so long as the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive"</em>.  He further went to demand that <em>"independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the Constitution and the rights of individuals"</em>. He believes that independence of the judiciary from either the legislative or executive is a much needed act, for it will ensure the right and correct implementation of judgement. He proposed that <em>"complete independence of the courts of justice is peculiarly essential in a limited Constitution"</em>.

Moreover, judges' permanent appointment will ensure the rightful passing of judgement which can be flawed if the judges are appointed periodically. For no two persons are the same, so this may lead to differences in opinions which will lead to the former judgement being recanted by the next person appointed. Thus, he opines that <em>"periodical appointments, however regulated, or by whomsoever made, would, in some way or other, be fatal to their necessary independence"</em>.

Thus, the correct answer is the third option.

You might be interested in
EXPLIAN HOW KNOWING THE THE NAMES AND LOCATIONS OF THE 13 COLONIES CAN STRENGTHEN YOUR GEOGRSPHY SKILLS
suter [353]
To connect to our communities: The 13 colonies were the basis of the first states that made up America. ... The struggle to resist tyrannical efforts by the British Parliament would lead to the American Revolution, which yielded the Constitution of the United States and other important documents and principles.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does Jean Bodin define absolute rule?
sammy [17]

The writings of Jean Bodin provides us with an early theorisation of the idea of sovereignty even though the examples he uses are quite extensive. Essential to Bodin's notion of sovereignty is that the power the sovereign holds must be absolute and permanent. If a ruler holds absolute power for the duration of his life he can be said to be sovereign. In contrast, an elected official or some other person that holds limited powers can not be described to be sovereign. Although at times Bodin suggests that the people are sovereign, his definition of sovereignty as absolute, unlimited and enduring power points purposively towards a positive association of sovereignty and a singular monarchical, or even tyrannical, power.

Another qualification that Bodin introduces into the definition of sovereignty as absolute and perpetual is one that will become increasingly important in subsequent theorisations, culminating in the work of Carl Schmitt. For Bodin, a sovereign prince is one who is exempt from obedience to the laws of his predecessors and more importantly, those issued by himself. Sovereignty rests in being above, beyond or excepted from the law. Although it occupies a subordinate place in Bodin's theorisation, it could be said that this exception from being subject to the law is the quintessential condition of sovereignty in so far as it is understood politically.

Although for Bodin sovereignty is characterised by absolute and perpetual power he goes on to make a series of important qualifications to this concept. These come from two principle concerns. The first is real politics - Bodin seems to be aware that absolute power could licence behaviour injurious to sovereign authority. Hence for example a sovereign cannot and should not confiscate property nor break contractual agreements made with other sovereigns, estates nor private persons. The second reason is Bodin's underlying theological notion of divine authority and natural law. A sovereign may put aside civil law, but he must not question natural law (in which it appears right of property is sanctioned). Saying this, it is ultimately from this divine authority that the earthly right of sovereign power is legitimated. The prince literary does god's bidding, and yet by virtue of this can do wrong. Hopefully this helps out some :)

5 0
3 years ago
The Mexican Cession was bought in 1853 and completed our continental U.S <br><br> True or False
grin007 [14]

Answer:

it's true

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
What were the major ways the world was different in 1450 from what it had been in 600, because of Islam
zysi [14]
The spread of Islam changed many countries. The religion quickly spread and many countries of power classified themselves as Muslim countries. This united the countries in a religious manner and all of the Muslim countries were led and ruled by a khalifah. The united rule helped Muslims achieve victory over battles that would change the face of the Earth.
4 0
3 years ago
Cartoon analysis Reconstruction (1866-1877)
cestrela7 [59]

Answer:

That's negative 11

Explanation:

1866-1877=-11

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • President Johnson’s Pardon of 1865 benefited
    10·2 answers
  • Which ?government branch interprets the constitution and shapes the law
    13·1 answer
  • Interest groups are most concerned with what political outcome?
    14·2 answers
  • How did Nazis treat their enemies?
    12·2 answers
  • What section of the United States was the most populous in the antebellum period?
    15·1 answer
  • Which group or organization was not inspired by the civil rights movement of the 1950s and 1960s? A. American Indian Movement (A
    5·2 answers
  • Which is an example of a presidential power that has no clear limitation?
    13·2 answers
  • Why did God not save Jesus during the Crucifixion?
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following were organizations that fought for equal rights for African Americans in the 20th Century? (Choose the th
    15·1 answer
  • antifederalists supported the constitution and felt that the u.s. need a strong central government true or false
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!