1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
solong [7]
3 years ago
15

Why isnt a country like china considered a melting pot

History
1 answer:
Luda [366]3 years ago
7 0
Most of the population comes from the same or similar backgrounds and cultures. there are not high rates of immigration from many countries and cultures. a place like NYC would be considered a melting pot due to its cultural diversity.
You might be interested in
Resistance to the Vietnam War grew in the late 1960s. What explanation does the graph support for that growing resistance?
Galina-37 [17]

The United States became more deeply involved in Vietnam in the late 1960s.

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What role does ignorance play in our politics today?
Darina [25.2K]

Answer:

The major role in nowadays are giving media to say something wrong to other person and giving them money in nowadays.

Explanation:

mark me brainliest ❤

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Please Help...<br> Why is it important for people to know about Reconstruction?<br> A short response
Stels [109]

Answer:

Explanation: the reconstruction era?

i'll edit it just need to know if that's what your talking about

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was the Free Soil Party, and Liberty Party important and major?
goldenfox [79]

Hey!

Answer:

Free-Soil Party, (1848–54), minor but influential political party in the pre-Civil War period of American history that opposed the extension of slavery into the western territories. Fearful of expanding slave power within the national government, Rep. David Wilmot of Pennsylvania in 1846 introduced into Congress his famous Wilmot Proviso, calling for the prohibition of slavery in the vast southwestern lands that had been newly acquired from Mexico. The Wilmot concept, which failed in Congress, was a direct ideological antecedent to the Free-Soil Party. Disappointed by the ambivalent position of the Whig Party toward slavery, “Conscience” Whigs held a convention in August 1848 at Buffalo, New York. There they were joined by delegates from 17 states drawn from the Liberty Party and the antislavery faction of the New York Democrats, known as “Barnburners.” The Free-Soilers’ historic slogan calling for “free soil, free speech, free labour, and free men” attracted small farmers, debtors, village merchants, and household and mill workers, who resented the prospect of black-labour competition—whether slave or free—in the territories.

In early 1840, abolitionists founded the Liberty Party as a political outlet for their antislavery beliefs. A mere eight years later, bolstered by the increasing slavery debate and growing sectional conflict, the party had grown to challenge the two mainstream political factions in many areas. In The Liberty Party, 1840–1848, Reinhard O. Johnson provides the first comprehensive history of this short-lived but important third party, detailing how it helped to bring the antislavery movement to the forefront of American politics and became the central institutional vehicle in the fight against slavery.

As the major instrument of antislavery sentiment, the Liberty organization was more than a political party and included not only eligible voters but also disfranchised African Americans and women. Most party members held evangelical beliefs, and as Johnson relates, an intense religiosity permeated most of the group’s activities. He discusses the party’s founding and its national growth through the presidential election of 1844; its struggles to define itself amid serious internal disagreements over philosophy, strategy, and tactics in the ensuing years; and the reasons behind its decline and merger into the Free Soil coalition in 1848.

<em>You can refer to these 3 paragraphs, </em>

<em>Hope it helps :)</em>

<em>Though I may be wrong :(</em>

<em>Have a great day!</em>

4 0
3 years ago
What did it mean for adam and eve to have been created with orignial holiness and original justuce?
frutty [35]
They literally had everything until the man fell into temptation. Know that in the Bible it says "man shall not eat the fruit" so technically when eve took the bite, she still didn't know it was bad until when Adam took the bite and he realized what he has done, that's when eve realized what she has done. If it were to say "man and woman" then the whole story would be so different. The Bible would be different as well.
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • In Italy, Biennio Rosso was the period of social unrest democratic reforms widespread famine
    15·2 answers
  • ___ the american troops defeated the british in new york during the
    6·1 answer
  • Describe 4 inventions of that revolutionized the textile industry
    15·1 answer
  • Which type of historical text typically focuses on a particular topic, integrating primary and secondary source documents to adv
    9·1 answer
  • 4. Responding to social conditions and the African American civil rights movement, what other movements emerged during the time
    15·1 answer
  • How is the declaration of Independence similar and different from the constitution?
    7·1 answer
  • How was imperialism a cause of World War 1
    13·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not a trade commodity for Haiti? O Coffee Sugar sh O Livestock Cotton​
    6·1 answer
  • Was the Islamic empire and the ottoman empire the same thing?
    5·1 answer
  • Briefly reflect on how the history explored in this section might relate to your own life. In what ways are the religious or pol
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!