Answer:
Mitigate her damages.
Explanation:
In this scenario, Velma contracts with Gordon, who agrees to build a stone retaining wall and French drain on her property. The wall and drain are necessary to prevent erosion of her land, which is falling into the creek on her property at a rapid rate. If Gordon breaches the contract by failing to get to work, Velma is under a legal obligation to mitigate her damages.
Velma has the legal rights and responsibilities to make sure she does anything humanly possible to reduce or lessen the damages to her property.
She could sue Gordon for not getting to work or failing to start work thereby causing more damage.
Answer :
A. Stereotype (i think this is right)
Answer:
c. $24,750
Explanation:
For computing the fixed cost first we have to determine the variable cost per hour by using high low method which is shown below:
Variable cost per hour = (High total cost - low total cost) ÷ (High desk manufactured - lower desk manufactured)
= ($86,625 - $49,500) ÷ (4,500 desk - 1,800 desk)
= $37,125 ÷ 2,700 desk
= $13.75
Now the fixed cost equal to
= High total cost - (High desk manufactured × Variable cost per hour)
= $ 86,625 - (4,500 desk × $13.75)
= $86,625 - $61,875
= $24,750
Explanation:
Training is an activity leading to skilled behavior, the process of teaching employees the basic skills they need to perform their jobs. ... So, Training is a social and continuous process of increasing skills, knowledge, attitudes and efficiency of employees for getting better performance in the organization.
Answer:
B) the uneven distribution of gains and losses from free trade.
Explanation:
One of the most important reasons why governments impose trade barriers is to protect domestic jobs (and domestic industries). We are part of a society (country), and society's most important component is people, not money. Generally the economic gains of free trade are larger than the economic losses, but the economic losses hurt the most.
Imagine if no trade barriers actually existed, how many millions of jobs would be lost in the US. Trade barriers are nothing new, the current president didn't invent them. He just incinerated them.
How does a leader tell the people that 10 or 20 million must lose their jobs and probably will not be able to find any similar jobs in the future just because the rest of society will benefit from cheaper products. The lives of 20 million households (50-80 million people) would be destroyed, while 280 million people would benefit.
The amount of harm done to the people that lose their jobs is much greater than any individual benefit.
