It helped to end several bank runs<span> by transferring funds to </span>banks<span> in need of temporary liquidity.</span>
The statement is TRUE.
In 1951 Solomon Asch carried out the famous Conformity Experiments, set out to <u>measure the dynamics of group-thinking</u>. He presented his subjects with an extremely simple judgement task with a very obvious answer, joined by a previously prepared group that was told to answer incorrectly on purpose. By making it so simple, it would be clear that any subject that answered incorrectly would be doing it because of group pressure. With this first experiment, <u>Asch proved a correlation between a group's influence on an individual's conformity</u>.
Further trials went deeper into which factors were the most impactful to influence conformity. The results showed that <u>increasing group size</u> by up to three times, <u>raised the conformity levels to 32%</u>. However, larger groups did not impact this number. Applying group unanimity, on the other hand, showed an increase of as much as 80% on the conformity rates.
This clarified how much bigger of an influence unanimity was over group size, meaning it mattered more to an individual if an entire group agreed on something (even if the group was small), over a larger majority's opinion when a group was more split-up.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Invalid and rule 2 is broken
Explanation:
The argument made about the star students and it is mis concepted that all of the star students will be working on the east coast. The statement is therefore invalid as there is no valid support of the facts and figures which will support the statement.
Answer:
The statement which is the best argument against Social Darwinism is:
B. A good work ethic can eliminate a lot of the disadvantages of poverty.
Explanation:
Social Darwinism is a philosophy that incorporates notions taken from Darwinism, applying them to sciences such as sociology and economics. As we know, <u>Darwinism is based on the idea of "survival of the fittest". Therefore, Social Darwinism explains differences in status, wealth, and success by stating that those who have those things are better than those who do not. In other words, if someone is poor or unsuccessful, that means that person is not "evolved" enough.</u>
The problem with Social Darwinism is that is justifies discrimination and imperialism. It places the blame on those who are actually suffering the consequences of a broken and unfair system. With that in mind, we can easily eliminate options A and C, since they agree with Social Darwinism. Option D can also be eliminated because it merely states a fact that is true, but does not refute Social Darwinism.<u> Letter B is the best option. It argues that there is a way to eliminate many of the disadvantages, that is, it shows the problem with the system, refuting Social Darwinism.</u>
